This is a very broad potential use, isnt it . Thats correct. Its one of the reasons we do look at the new uses and kind of new companies. The lab definition is broad and more than just biological labs, kind of like what you would think of with chemists and beakers and things like that. Especially with the Way Companies and Tech Companies are evolving today, we really do dig into what the types of products that theyre using and then proving that they fall within the lab definition and not within the office definition. We drill down pretty fine grain in layouts, business operations, making sure that what we this doing is is consistent with what the land use definitions that we have are consistent with the codes. They go through the letter of determination. We will have the company off employ and help prove why they are, for example, a lab use or pdr use or other types. Any concern would be different than commissioner moores and this is a Residential District. If you put a bio Chemistry L
This is a very broad potential use, isnt it . Thats correct. Its one of the reasons we do look at the new uses and kind of new companies. The lab definition is broad and more than just biological labs, kind of like what you would think of with chemists and beakers and things like that. Especially with the Way Companies and Tech Companies are evolving today, we really do dig into what the types of products that theyre using and then proving that they fall within the lab definition and not within the office definition. We drill down pretty fine grain in layouts, business operations, making sure that what we this doing is is consistent with what the land use definitions that we have are consistent with the codes. They go through the letter of determination. We will have the company off employ and help prove why they are, for example, a lab use or pdr use or other types. Any concern would be different than commissioner moores and this is a Residential District. If you put a bio Chemistry L
Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat
Street. The building was demolished on july 24, 2018 before the structural problems were reported. The foundation poured is the subject of variance requested today. This is not an extraordinary and exceptional circumstance. We ask the commission not approve this variance and uphold the previous rulings by mandating building in the predemolition size and restoring breezeway and not rewarding violators with a vertical addition. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello, commissioners. I am carlos. I own 4124 21st street next to the project. The Planning Department received the false letter. Please remove that from your records. I have never supported th the project. The space around my home because of the new construction. They said they were going to stay within the envelope of the new house. The new wall is up against my house. Before i could walk between the houses. The new construction touches my roof and the space is flush with my house. Please dont let that happen. Thank you. Next spe
We kind of had the same speech. Basically, to provide union paying jobs to our members and provide a lot more housing for San Francisco residents, affordable housing, and, you know, good union paying jobs where they can afford to stay here in the city. That is basically all i have got to say. Lets keep the progress going, keep people working. It is all good. Thank you. Please approve this project. Next speaker, please. Same thing to say. Thank you, Planning Commissioners. It is a pleasure to represent the members of Carpenters Local Union 22 with greg and bob representing 261. Our fellow members were here earlier today. Pretty much what they said to support the project, high paying jobs for laborers and carpenters to keep the families and benefits with the housing they can afford. Thank you very much. Approve this project and it will be great. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good afternoon. I am with the labor local 261. One fact that we have to feel everybody about supporting the pro