who goes in and out of the russian embassy and the russian consulate. he wanted to go up there and set up a secret channel. the idea that he forgot he had that meeting and signed the form saying, no, no, there was no meeting, jared kushner lied when he was filling out that form. you think trump protects him or fires him? he s unfirable. he s his son-in-law. that s why he s in this position despite this naivete, an extraordinarily dangerous, possibly treasonous naivete is that he is one of the only people that donald trump feels that he can trust. if one person is going to get fired, it s not going to be your blood. that s why the tmp boys are back in new york and ivanka is in d.c. and jared is there. thank you, sir. thank you. dead on arrival. why so many on both sides of the political aisle say the president s budget goals are
puzzling, underlying position, the policy doesn t make a lot of sense given their budget goals. as i understand it, republicans have five basic goals, number one, they say is cut the deficit. number two, cut entitlement spending. number three, protect defense spending and possibly even increase it. four, make the tax code simple by cleaning out deductions and loopholes. and five, five of course is always lower tax rates. now, the white house is able to cut a deal with republicans that accomplish one, two, three, four, it wouldn t lower tax rates but it will do all the other things. republicans won t entertain that deal. they say no, no, we prefer the sequester instead of one, two, three, and four. they get much less than a larger deal, they won t touch entitlement spending really at all. they will see defense spending go through an incredibly big cut. rather than striking a deal with
and other allergy symptoms all in one pill. zyrtec-d®. at the pharmacy counter. i stand by those commitments, to make the reforms for smart spending cuts. but we also need republicans to adopt the same approach to tax reform as speaker boehner championed just two months ago. the president says we have to have another tax increase in order to avoid the sequester. well, mr. president, you got your tax increase. it is time to cut spending here in washington. i don t understand this debate. i don t understand the republican position on the sequester. and i don t mean the politics and the polls. we already talked about the polling doesn t seem to look so good for the republicans. what matters more than that, the puzzling, underlying position, the policy doesn t make a lot of sense given their budget goals. as i understand it, republicans