opened up the palaces all year round, ratherthan opened up the palaces all year round, rather than being places for the royals to live, that would bring in more money from tourism. there was no link or evidence between the royals existing with tourism. that has been disputed quite a few times. yes, but surely it is part of the british image, isn t it? it is part of the tradition, the pomp and ceremony, there is some of the reasons that people come to this country every year. country every year. yes, but buckingham country every year. yes, but buckingham palace - country every year. yes, but buckingham palace would i country every year. yes, but i buckingham palace would still country every year. yes, but - buckingham palace would still exist. the palace of versailles does not struggle for visitors just because there is not a sitting monarch. all of those things about history and the portraits, those would all still exist, but perhaps without this huge payment every year for the roya