we have seg garegated education even though brown v. board was passed in 1974. all of the fundamental policies and political opinions that he helped calcify over the course of 30-something years, he s now, that was then. now, let s not move too far to the left. but i need the nomination so i can move forward and fight trump and be the tough guys in the parking lot. before you get to the general, to fight the bully, and whatever performance of masculinity you want to have, you need to fundamentally answer some specific questions that younger voters have. i think his speech and his apology went over very well in south carolina. there s older black voters who saw his dedication and loyalty to barack obama for eight years. they respect him for that. were surprised by that possibly. but that will carry him so far. there are other voters in other
because it was 20 years after brown v board. it was disastrous. they didn t have access to their own schools. [ overlapping speakers ] we both can agree. bad policy. we both can agree bussing failed. that s right. you about we need to understand why it failed. because you are telling the parents that they no longer have control of their own education of their students. if you want to tell parents they shouldn t have if you want to tell white parents, if you want to tell white communities and white parents that you can hoard the resources of a good education if you want to then you need to take the hits. it accelerated these trends. and camera harris came out and said i support that. that s not what she was saying. hold on. it is an important and critical conversation. having said that, in the context of what we are looking at today, which is numbers that are moving in kamala harris s favor we are going to get more money reports although she reported she did
i know busing was unpopular in the 70s. yeah. i know busing was unpopular the last time that there was a poll was taken and if you went to liberty city you ll find the segregated schools. in harlem, the bronx, the segregated schools. we don t support busing right now joe, you re right to talk about the trajectory of this issue. and so if so to have a comprehensive conversation about it i think we need to talk about 1954 and the significance of brown v board of educationwhich if the supreme court had not decided it i would not be sitting here as a member of the united states senate and as a serious contender for the united states of america.
when brown v board of education was decided and then busing followed, that was the way we ll integrate schools that was the beginning of certain families from beginning of the flight of certain families from public schools that s why one of my issues is about what we need to do to pay teachers their value. because over the course of that period of time we have also devalued and pulled resources from the public education in america. yes, you see the segregated schools but it s about socioeconomic status of families. the families that can afford to put their kids in private schools do because the resources are there for a better education often. teachers are paid better. so that s why one of my proposals that i m very proud of is to say let s pay teachers their value and i m prepared as president to have the first federal investment to the teacher pay gap being closed in
that changed us. the market supreme court decision from 1978, amazing and very dull but incredibly important. it is not up there with brown v. board and roe v. wade. this case enables banks to you know how citi bank is in south dakota in. yes. that comes from this case. there were no credit card violences in this country. by 1970s hundreds of those. elizabeth warren says she needs to have a copy of this book. you can get your hands-on this copy. it is a great book, i appreciate