government to do something about that. isn t that the point of the whole civil rights division? there are historically aggrieved groups, of course, that were discriminated against for centuries here in the united states, which actually asian americans are part of that group which was the interesting spin, as you just announced out of today s news. but, african-americans, i mean, we have why do we have brown vs. board of education: why do we have to all all these rulings and jim crow rules. why did we have to desegregate schools. that s why we have the office of civil rights for those groups in particular. tucker: well, actually, no. the law applies to all people equally regardless of their skin color. despite attempts by the left to pervert that and pervert the rule of law itself. unless you disagree with that, unless you disagree that all laws apply to people by virtue of the fact they are american, then how can you defend discrimination just because the victims are not in some
government to do something about that. isn t that the point of the whole civil rights division? there are historically aggrieved groups, of course, that were discriminated against for centuries here in the united states, which actually asian americans are part of that group which was the interesting spin, as you just announced out of today s news. but, african-americans, i mean, we have why do we have brown vs. board of education: why do we have to all all these rulings and jim crow rules. why did we have to desegregate schools. that s why we have the office of civil rights for those groups in particular. tucker: well, actually, no. the law applies to all people equally regardless of their skin color. despite attempts by the left to pervert that and pervert the rule of law itself. unless you disagree with that, unless you disagree that all laws apply to people by virtue of the fact they are american, then how can you defend discrimination just because the victims are not in some
civil rights division?ig there arehe historically aggrieved groups, of course, that were discriminatedve against for centuries here in the united states, which actually asian americans are part of that group which was the interesting spin, as you just announced out of today s news. but, african-americans, i mean, we have why do we have brown vs. board of education: why do we haveo to all all these rulings and why did we have to desegregate schools. there is a history of discrimination. that s why we have the office of civil rights for those groups in particular. tucker: well, actually, no. the law applies to all people equally regardless of their skin color.e despite attempts by the left to pervert that and pervert the rule of law itself. unless you disagree with that, unless you disagreeh that all laws apply to people by virtue of the fact they are american, then howle can you defend discrimination just because the victims are not in some group you think should be protected? i m
in the community but not others based on our bigotry. i refuse to accept that. i m not going to go to another county f. we go to another county, if we say this is okay, it will become okay everywhere. it will trickle down county to county. so, paul, quickly on the legal end of this, she s an elected official. this is not someone you can hire and fire at will. the legislature might have to get involved for impeachment. there might have to be a criminal case, a misdemeanor case. where do you see this going in terms of the contempt stuff? well, there is precedent and looking back to brown vs. the board of education when segregation was ordered ended in school systems across the united states, there were many elected officials, i think some governors, george wallace, standing and blocking students from attending the university of alabama. the courts came in and they said if you continue in that behavior, we re going to hold you in contempt. and, if necessary, we ll send in
60s and that s bernie sanders and hillary clinton and we want them as older people to remember those passions and commitments that many of them first formed early on. you see a huge demographic difference on, say, same sex marriage since trans folks were mentioned in the earlier piece. there s a huge just demographic difference between young adults and older americans on this. so throughout american history there has been a lot of reformist history. we were talking before about some of the student activists in the brown vs. board of education and companion cases. a 15-year-old? yes. we may have to start your answer now and come back after the break. what really strikes me is the dreamer, the dream act movement, the same criticisms were made, why are you targeting the liberal democratic president? why are you not targeting