Investigations, i was not expecting the secretary to talk about facebook in those terms and i think thats interesting and important and deserves some reflection. I think that facebook should answer to what she said. So thats kind of top line. I guess overall im probably still too much in the middle of it. I have to say at a personal level, im happy to see her doing well. When you see someone a lifetime public servant, been the wringer shes been through, we all imagine the personal toll that takes and so i was happy to read the book and think that its a good book and recognize her voice in it and doing this good work to produce this thing. Also happy to see her in person and she she is well. She is definitely still in the arena, though. Combative on the Trump Administration in without mincing words at all and very, very straightforward and very not aggressive is the right word but assertive and well informed on the russia stuff. So, shes this is not a retired politician. I know she said
That discussion is. Well, i mean, the facebook thing that i was just discussing right there, i think just as a as a point of focus in terms as a point of focus in terms of whats likely to happen next about the Russian Investigations, i was not expecting the secretary to talk about facebook in those terms and i think thats interesting and important and deserves some reflection. I think that facebook should answer to what she said. So thats kind of top line. I guess overall im probably still too much in the middle of it. I have to say at a personal level, im happy to see her doing well. When you see someone a lifetime public servant, been the wringer shes been through, we all imagine the personal toll that takes and so i was happy to read the book and think that its a good book and recognize her voice in it and doing this good work to produce this thing. Also happy to see her in person and she she is well. She is definitely still in the arena, though. Combative on the Trump Administratio
Campaigns, meaning when you see a big check, all of this is reported, the spending is reported in Campaign Spending reports, but this spending indicates that money was spent at a law firm. You never, ever know what that law firm was doing. They might have been having you comply with fec reports. Right. All sorts of things. And thats a good point of if we do end up getting further information on this from that bank subpoena. I mean, it may be very opaque in terms of where how those payments funneled through. The democrats have said, the democratic leaning law firm, named on being the democratic funder here, they said in the statement about this, well, listen, we werent the only people that funded the research. The republicans should come out and admit it now, too. The republicans so far are not doing that and may be hard to figure it out seeing the records. So my guess is that it was the best funded republican president ial campaign at the time that was also getting the most criticism f
To wait until monday and a thing that this story shows is just how much what you could call masked spending 0 curls in campaigns, meaning when you see a big check, all of this is reported, the spending is reported in Campaign Spending reports, but this spending indicates that money was spent at a law firm. You never, ever know what that law firm was doing. They might have been having you comply with fec reports. Right. All sorts of things. And thats a good point of if we do end up getting further information on this from that bank subpoena. I mean, it may be very opaque in terms of where how those payments funneled through. The democrats have said, the democratic leaning law firm, named on being the democratic funder here, they said in the statement about this, well, listen, we werent the only people that funded the research. The republicans should come out and admit it now, too. The republicans so far are not doing that and may be hard to figure it out seeing the records. So my guess