Of course we have these capabilities, but the most important answer to the question why us is even more fundamental. It is this. We should not be content standing aside. We have a fundamental question. Act now with our friend has been struck in this way, then the allies of the world can be forgiven for asking, if not now, when. That leads to the next question, why now. Wasfirst answer to that because of the grave danger that they pose to our security. There are additional reasons why action now is so important. Paris,t the attack in theres a real political process underway. This could lead to a new government in syria with whom we can defeat for good. We cannot wait for that to be complete before we begin acting to grant isil. Lets be clear about the military objectives that we are pursuing. Yes we wanted to take a terrorists by canceling their network committed targeting their training camps, and taking of those policy against the u. K. , but there is a broader objective. Peddlelong a
So we need to do the same thing in syria. Mr. Speaker, another reason for action now is that success in iraq in squeezing the caliphate is put at risk by our failure to act in syria. This border is not recognized by isil and we tamper our efforts if we stop acting when we reach the border. When we come to the question, why now, we have to ask ourselves whether the risks of inaction are greater than the risks of taking action . Every day we failed to act is a day when isil can grow stronger and more plots can be undertaken. Mr. Speaker, that is why their all says yes,ved that the risks of inaction are someto some of our asking specifically whether taking action can make the u. K. More of a target for iso. The judgment of the direct general of Security Service in the chairman of the joint Intelligence Committee is that the u. K. Is already in the top tier of countries that isil is targeting. I am clear that the only way to deal with that reality is to address the threat we face, and do s
Among the victims of the bataclan theater, many have become professional musicians. This is the music that the. Errorists could not stand it was that harmony that they wanted to break. It is a joy that they wanted to kill with their bombs. Well, they will not stop that. The best way to respond is we more, calledn concerts and shows, continue to st. O our stadiums and in denis, we will participate in all major sports events. Emotions. Are the same it is beyond our differences, our different color skins, believe of religions because we are a single, one single nation based on the same values and supported by the same values. What do the terrorists want . Did they want to divide us . Oppose us to each other . Cause strife . I assure you they will fail. They cultivate death, but we, we have love. Love for life. Those who fell on november the 13th, where the whole of france, teachers,ournalist, drivers, engineers, architects, carpenters, photographers, civil servants, advertisers, salesman,
Coalition with the United States. Its the matter of knowing what are the targets that we wish to strike and the targets that we must not strike to coordinate the exchange of data and your second question on the oil right . Destroyed in turkey, the g20 held in turkey. I showed photographs that were taken at an altitude of 5000 meters. The trucks that are carrying the oil, form a column that goes over the horizon. It looks like a living moving oil pipeline with industrial quantities of oil a comes from syrian territory in the hands of the terrorists. The oil comes from that territory and from our aircraft. We can see where these still trucks heading. Theyre helding into turkey. I can imagine turkish officials no nothing about this. Thats difficult to believe. But in theory its possible. But it doesnt mean that the turkish authorities must not put a stop to this elicit trade and in fact, as they do Security Council resolution, that bans the purchase of oil from terrorists because these fu
Assistance, like snape, a food program. It is a Great Program in america, but it is not helping people get into employment so they can really raise their incomes and move out of poverty. We need more of that in our Public Policy focus, from washington and from the states. Specifically, what would you do to change the Food Assistance program. Guest iran the program in new york city and we saw a huge ran the in number i program in new york city and we saw a huge increase in number of people getting Food Assistance. But we also wanted to get people and employment as quickly as possible. The two often did not meet. Then we had a program that would provide assistance but it was not set up to encourage people into Employment Services programs, either by encouraging or by requiring. For certain populations, single individuals without children, who are perfectly ablebodied and working age, i think there should be a much greater focus on helping them get into employment and encouraging them to