Epidemiologist, joining us now, to answer these questions. Thank you for being here. Other states and countries have issued curfews, but how effective are they, or is this more of a wakeup call so that people get it and take the spread seriously . In europe, at least in some places they have been quite successful. The french have turned the curve over, it started to come down, pretty precipitously, after they invoked a curfew. In europe, a lot of this has to do with closing bars. Which as you can imagine, are centers of social interaction. But i think that is, those are pretty much closed anyway, it does put time frames are on things, and gives a break at least four most of the evening, and the early morning. The other thing it doesnt do is it doesnt just close everything down period, which is a good way and more layered in that sense. Californias Positivity Rate is up 52 , hospitalization 63 percent, and what do the numbers tell you about the spread in peoples behavior . The spread in
Correspondent sounds a bit like something from a spy thriller reveals the outlets predetermine narrative on russia. As u. S. States rolled out, new pandemic rules and the soaring infection rate politicians a quarter flouting their own rules. Either. Thanks for joining us, midday. Here in moscow, this is all to international an act of hypocrisy, just for show thats how russia described the u. S. Decision to pull out of the open skies treaty, which permits mutual aerial surveillance flights. Moscow also warned the move would Harm International security earlier are trying to join me in the studio to discuss developments. Moscow is disappointed to say the least about the decision by the Us Administration to kick the legs from under the treaty for which as the russian side is putting it. The us has no legitimate reasons whatsoever. Moscow maintains that claims of violations on the part of russia, of the treaty that has been in force for 18 years, have all been made up, plus no one seen any
A court flouting their own rules. Thanks so much for joining us. This is r. T. International an act of hypocrisy. And just for show, thats how russia described the u. S. Decision to pull out of the open skies treaty, which permits mutual aerial surveillance flights. Moscow also warned that the move would Harm International security. Trying to join me in the studio to discuss developments. Moscow is disappointed to say the least about the decision by the Us Administration to kick the legs from under the treaty for which as the russian side is posting it. The us has no legitimate reasons whatsoever. Moscow maintains that claims of violations on the part of russia, of the treaty that has been in force for 18 years, have all been made up, plus no one seen any proof of that. Moscow has blamed washington for violations to the other side, has denied it, but the question is whether that is a good enough reason to get rid of the agreement. The answer from moscow is no. And we know the answer fr
Regime a New York Times job ad for their moscow correspondent. Sounds like something straight out of a spy thriller and reveals the outlets predetermine narrative on russia. This is r. T. International coming to you straight from the russian capital where its just turned 2 pm. Welcome to the program, an act of hypocrisy, and just for show thats how russia describes the u. S. , his decision to pull out of the open skies treaty, which permits mutual aerial surveillance flights. Also warns that the move will Harm International security. Earlier neil harvey discussed the development with are trying to moscow is disappointed to say the least about the decision by the Us Administration to kick the legs from under the treaty for which as the russian side is putting it. The us has no legitimate reasons whatsoever. Moscow maintains that claims of violations on the part of russia, of the treaty that has been in force for 18 years, have all been made up, plus no one seen any proof of that. Moscow
Well, i dont know is motive, but i just think its totally irresponsible. Faces outside the white house with the latest. There are those around joe biden who believe that perhaps he should head to the courts and make the trumpet ministrations start the transition period. But theres a couple of difficulties for that. One politically, joe biden doesnt want to do that. He wants to be seen as the guy who can work with the republicans and thinks, taking court action. We cannot fit into that narrative. The 2nd thing is, the one thing of the law is a bit woolly. Theres no exact date of when the transition must start and therefore you really dont want to go to court unless youre guaranteed of a significant when. So what hes hoping to do is put political pressure and also hope that Public Opinion will force the trumpet ministration into moving towards the transition. Never far from the chamber of commerce, which tends to support republican candidates. Its been very clear, it thinks that delaying