results and, you know, essentially impeding the transfer of power, those key meetings are things that the justice department wants a lot more detail of. now, the you know, i think the first thing you re going to have is mike pence is going to comply with the subpoena. he s been negotiating for months. and they have at least a first pass where they talk about the things that are in the book already. and then the justice department can look and say, well, we want more than that. and you ve already kind of opened the door, and that s where donald trump and his legal team have the opportunity to come in and fight and i think certainly the justice department and pence s team believe that donald trump will do that eventually and take it all the way to the supreme court. so put this into context, elliott. you have this special counsel demanding testimony and documents through the power of a subpoena, that s a brig deal, to the former vice president of the united states. also a subpoena
president obama was not the only one making his case. israel s prime minister benjamin netanyahu appeared on three separate sunday shows where he explained his opposition to the nuclear framework while warning of iran s regional ambitions. i m not trying to kill any deal. i m trying to kill a bad deal. you say historic decision his or rig deal. it could be historically bad deal because it leaves the preeminent terrorist state of our time with a vast nuclear infrastructure. this is a deal that leaves iran with the capacity to produce the material for many many nuclear bombs and it does so by lifting the sanctions pretty much up front. so iran will have billions of dollars flown to its coffers not for schools or hospitals or roads, but to pump up its worldwide terror machine and its military machine which is busy conquering the middle east as we speak. i think the alternatives are not either this bad deal or war. i think there s a third
available to the minority remain intact. but i think if you look at the nominations of this administration, many of them have been noncontroversial, you know, penny prisker, new secretary of transportation, secretary of state, but the ones that generated controversy generated controversy. so, i think our reaction to these nominees will depend on the quality of these nominees and how controversial they are. he talks about how uncontroversial the secretary for state was. part of the reason john kerry s nomination was uncontroversial because they made a brig deal about susan rice and said, if you nominate john kerry, it will be easy and that sailed there. there s also this question of the federal courts and this deal does not apply to that. you can have de facto threshold, and the other big story of the obama presidency has been