it is not just trump s description. what epstein did was ask people a random selection of americans, he crowd sourced this to rate the alleged bias of the results that came up with they searched various election-related things on google and bing and yahoo. so if it was pro-trump it would get a five and pro-clinton it would get a minus five and then a calculation of alleged bias. the problem that as many political scientists have pointed out is that by this calculation, a search engine that featured many articles by far right website briets barts for example which is pro trump would be rated as less biased against clinton and more favorable toward trump than a website that featured the new york times or cnn. and people who observe journalism, mainstream readers know that a report by the new york times is worth more in informational value than a puff piece from breitbart. the second problem is that epstein presented no evidence that even if there were bias,