Since i know the character of mr. Putin, i am surprised why he has been so restrained. Hy he has kept silent i am talking about you. Introduce yourself please. First, mass media have been reporting that you met with the sector. Set thisrm the fact . Regret conducting these talks . Representatives talks with the representatives of the opposition for negotiations. Theresentatives were a lot of them. The goal of all of them is to to find aoodshed peaceful solution. There was nothing wrong about that. Fortunately, we were not able to find a peaceful solution. I would like to reaffirm that it is not acceptable for me to see any other alternative to a peaceful solution. This has been due to the actions of these people. I never gave any orders to the police to open fire. The police was without any weapons until the very last moment when they were under threat and people started shooting at them. According to the law, the police has the right to selfdefense, especially when there have been mas
Thresholds based on its ongoing assessment of the costs and benefits. May i ask about your interpretation of the phrase there are a lot of different interpretations that have gone on. Here is some choices. I want to ask you to pick what you are arguing for. Your original position was that any pollutant meant that was your original position. Judge kavanaughs position is it means any max pollutant. Any naaqs pollutant. Theres another position that says it is really any regulated pollutant other than Greenhouse Gases. Those are four different interpretations. I guess i am asking you which one you are arguing for. I am here on behalf of the private party petitioners. We have two arguments. The principal one of is the one i would like to focus on. And that is because and that is where i would choose an option the pst program is focused on omissions that have specific impacts. And not globally undifferentiated phenomena. I take it that the sort of ozone pollutants are not area specific. Woul