Charge. The truth is in the history of this republic, theres never been a single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against a president like the one thats being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That, as weve said many times today, is actually quite common. And by the way, lets remember it needs to be noted again that President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight you are listening to one of the many hours of todays very Historic House Judiciary Committee hearing on the articles of impeachment against president donald trump. Our live continuing coverage will take place over this hour and further hours as needed. But we want to let you know how were going to cover this. Were keeping an eye on this hearing. We have reason to believe there could be a vote on the current amendment soon. The committees obviously been going full s
A single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against the president like the one being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That as we said many times today is actually quite common. By the way, lets remember, noted again, President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight and investigation responsibilities. I noticed the statistics this morning when we started, there were 25 Administration Officials that testified before the House Oversight this year and 25 at the House Judiciary Committee. At the start of the Impeachment Inquiry the white house produced more than 100,000 pages of documents to the oversight committee. In spite of their allegations, the democrats know President Trump has a lawful cause to challenge the subpoenas because they involve direct wln are
communications between high ranking advisors and a president. Thats ve
i think that inside of the justice department really surprised by this and at the end of the day, really is up to the judge and what the judge does with everybody s briefing materials. so, the justice department feels that it s put out a strong argument why, for example, you know, donald trump s team needs to agree to the terms of protective order or have the judge assigned those terms. they re hopeful that they re going to have a judge who will keep to a schedule, want to move the case forward, and, you know, whether or not they re not going to probably argue about whether or not some of these lawyers on television. that is sort of beyond the scope of whether what they re arguing on court or what they might care about. but only something that s noticed by them and notice by the judge as well. at the end of the day, though, they feel that their job is to make their best case in court and in their legal filings, and see what happens. okay, what about donald trump s posing on his s
investigate the actions of trump and those around him all contributed to the slow pace garland and the deputy attorney general lisa monaco charted a cautious course aimed at restoring public trust in the department while some prosecutors below them chafed, feeling top officials were shying away from looking at evidence of potential crimes by trump and those close to him leaders at d.o.j. reportedly shot down plan after plan to look into all aspects of the coup lot the trump adviser roger stone s ties to extremists or into the documents trump used to pressure pence into stopping the certification of president joe biden s election win it got to the point where according to the washington post, brand new reporting, quote, some prosecutors even have the impression that trump had become a taboo topic at main justice. colleagues responsible for preparing briefing materials and updates for garland and monaco were warned to focus on foot soldiers and to avoid mentioning trump or his close al