That was the general messaging and certainly the feeling, what was believed, what was in the organisation. Believed, what was in the oruanisation. ,. , , believed, what was in the oruanisation. ,. ,. , organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and it organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and it would organisation. Sea cant identify an| individual . Know and it would have been over a individual . Know and it would have been over a number individual . Know and it would have been over a number of individual . Know and it would have been over a number of years. Individual . Know and it would have been over a number of years. It. Been over a number of years. It wouldnt have been just one person. That was the understanding within the organisation at the time. There are parts of the organisation i wasnt aware
the recent hacks and e-mail leaks. so, you know, malcolm unpack that for people at home. we heard about putin has a big break in the story yesterday. but the implication there being that what was new to us may have been old for the nominees based on the briefings they got in the summer well, that s new information to me, too. and outstanding job by nbc investigative. you know, so he was he was given in his first intelligence briefing information that showed the united states intelligence community had high confidence. and we killed people with high confidence with drones, by the way, almost 100% of the time. so high confidence that this hack was directly linked to moscow and it was the cia who took it a step further doing a proper analysis exactly as i had done with my book, and showed there had to have been a benefit to someone it wasn t just a chaos operation. putin endorsed trump as far back
regime. if you recall, in the intelligence briefing information released by the u.s. government, they pointed to, we have missile tracks, we have conversations, but they release none of that information other than the assertion of it. in fact, for me, and this is a bit of personal history, it s remarkable as i go back and remember and think about sitting through colin powell s briefing at the security council, you got actual photos, you got actual communications intercepts. i also remember they turned out to be all wrong, but leaving that aside, the administration of george w. bush actually released a considerable amount of raw intelligence. the administration didn t, and i think it will be saved in this regard by if they wait around until the inspectors report which will be in depth, authentic and from two separate analytical labs. and then quickly, david, if i may interrupt there, how long would it take before that report were available?
said and that s what i remember him saying to us about the same time on september 13th. senator finestein came out saying it was not fair to pillarry, her word, susan rice for using the unclassified version of talking points that had been prepared for the house intelligence committee and agreed on by consensus of all the intelligence agencies, that is not a fair hit on her to say she s not qualified to be secretary of state. some of your colleagues, lindsey graham and john mccain have been outspoke on this point. what say you? there is a lot of questions to be answered here yet and one would be if susan rice has lots of briefings just like i believe she has access to the president s daily briefing information, what did she know and was she giving information she knew not to be accurate. there s a difference if all you re doing is talking from the unclassified talking points, which means you can find most of