stanford s center for democracy. in a suburb in dallas, they assembled 523 registered voters from all across america and all political persuasions. they spent a long weekend talking about immigration, foreign policy, health care, the economy, and the environment. perhaps shocking the two sides weren t at each other s throat all weekend long. instead, participants looked at briefing booklets and broke into small discussion groups and shared their feelings. how can we continue to do that? before the sessions and after they were polled. the results were astonishing. support for immigrant work sevis soared. on the economy, democrats moved from the left to the center. people actually listened and changed their minds. it s all part of a model
for our what in the world segment. everybody agrees that americans are more polarized today than any time in recent history. but there is a group of experts who are trying to do something about it. last month an experiment called america in one move was led by james fishkin, the head of stanford s center for democracy and larry diamond. in an assembly in dallas, they took registered voters from all over central america. there they spent a long weekend talking about immigration, foreign policy, health care, the economy and the environment. perhaps shocking, the two sides weren t at each other s throats all weekend long. instead participants pored over briefing booklets and consulted with experts. they broke into small discussion groups and poured out their feelings. separating families, how can we continue to do that?
policy. the briefing materials president elect trump has used with phone calls with world leaders. whether or not he s used state department briefing booklets and information and the expertise of the people in the state department that s been available to him. can you confirm if if he did con summit th consult that before this phone call? i can confirm that he has access to those materials and he has access to diehl briefings and he has access to other information that comes to him from official government age anlss. does he read it though? of course he reads it. he s the busiest guy on the planet. pretty much has been for a while now. president elect pours the time in. he and vice president elect pence have talked to probably about 45 or 50 leaders now or met them. he s talked to 80 people or so as advisors are. folks offering their counsel, their experience, their vision.
this is the president-elect, this is his administration, he will be commander of the chief and president of the united states imminently. and he either there it is close or not disclose the full departments of that conversation. but he s well aware of what u.s. policy has been. there have been questions when the briefing materials that the president-elect has used in phone calls with world leaders, whether he s used state department briefing booklets and information and the expertise of people in the state department that has been available to him. can you confirm if he did consult that before this phone call? i can confirm that he has access to those materials and he has access to daily briefings and other information that comes to him from official government agencies. does he use it? of course he uses it. he reads everything. he s the busiest guy on the planet. has been for a while now. but the president-elect is fully engaged, just powers the time
whether or not he s used state department briefing booklets and information, and you know, theeth what s been provided to him. did he consult that before he had the phone call? he has access to those. he has access to does he use it though? of course he uses it. he reads everything. he s the busiest guy on the planet. pretty much has been for a while. does the president elect not have to adhere to certain protocols? is it because he s not been sworn in, he can do what he wants to do? it was interesting china s response was they lodged their complaint through the quote, unquote relevant office. meaning the actual ones in power and the ones that knew they were talking about. it was a backhanded insult to donald trump. i guess the question is what we don t know the answer to, did he