there is quite a rush to be in this group. in there is quite a rush to be in this . rou . , . , there is quite a rush to be in this u-rou. , . , ., there is quite a rush to be in this u-rou. , ., ., ., group. in principle, from all the speculation group. in principle, from all the speculation i group. in principle, from all the speculation i have group. in principle, from all the speculation i have read, - group. in principle, from all the speculation i have read, it- group. in principle, from all the i speculation i have read, it includes a lot of countries that never get close to fulfilling their potential. they don t really share a great deal in common other than the fact until it delivers that potential. i have written quite a lot in it because of obviously our history with the area i think for the core interests of current members, as i wrote, they would be better advised to have some criteria to what is the purpose of expanding the group and what s would a new m
happy to elaborate on that. the core of it, the brics political leadership, whilst it has been big on political symbolism, hasn t really achieved anything. i wanted to ask about really achieved anything. i wanted to ask about that, really achieved anything. i wanted to ask about that, what really achieved anything. i wanted to ask about that, what is - really achieved anything. i wanted to ask about that, what is this - to ask about that, what is this group do collectively? individually they all their own things. you coined the brics acronym, but he said: china part of it is sort of ridiculous, it is time for these countries to cooperate more closely. what should they cooperating on? there are a lot of things. they can go from really important challenging issues for their own collective and individual economies and the world economy, for example serious joint initiatives about combating climate change, at the other end important