found the security failures. so on wallbox, you could take full control of the charger. it could gain full access and remove the usual owner s access on the charger. it could stop them from charging their own vehicles and provide free charging to an attacker vehicle. and for the project ev, it s way worse because you can sideload finware, you can brick it, you can make it to be part a botnet and you could also make attack other servers. the problem in both cases is the lack of proper authentication between the mobile app on our smartphones often used to control these chargers and the computer servers that relay instructions to the boxes, known as apis. do you think it s an easy hike to do? could anyone do it?
so on wallbox, you could take full control of the charger. it could gain full access and remove the usual owner s access on the charger. it could stop them from charging their own vehicles and provide free charging to an attacker vehicle. and for the project ev, it s way worse because you can sideload finware, you can brick it, you can make it to be part a botnet and you could also make attack other servers. the problem in both cases is the lack of proper authentication between the mobile app on our smartphones often used to control these chargers and the computer servers that relay instructions to the boxes, known as apis. do you think it s an easy hike to do? could anyone do it? yes. well, the word anyone
these are the people who test systems and products to find flaws before anyone else does. vangelis is the hacker who found the security failures. so, on wallbox, you could take full control of the charger. it could gain full access and remove the usual owner s access on the charger. it could stop them from charging their own vehicles and provide free charging to an attacker vehicle. and for the project ev, it s way worse because you can sideload finware, you can make it you can brick it, you can make it to be part a modnet and you could also make attack other servers. make it attack other servers. the problem in both cases is the lack of proper authentication between the mobile app on our smartphones often used to control these chargers
the security failures. so on wallbox, you could take full control of the charger. it could gain full access and remove the usual owner s access on the charger. it could stop them from charging their own vehicles and provide free charging to an attacker vehicle. and for the project ev, it s way worse because you can sideload finware, you can make it you can brick it, you can make it to be part a modnet and you could also make attack other servers. the problem in both cases is the lack of proper authentication between the mobile app on our smartphones often used to control these chargers and the computer servers that relay instructions to the boxes . do you think it s
found the problems first. the number of so called white hat hackers is growing fast. these are the people who test systems and products to find flaws before anyone else does. vangelis is the hacker who found the security failures. so, on wallbox, you could take full control of the charger. it could gain full access and remove the usual owner s access on the charger. it could stop them from charging their own vehicles and provide free charging to an attacker vehicle. for the project ev, it s way worse because you can sideload finware, you can brick it, you can make it to be part a botnet and you could also make attack other servers. the problem in both cases is the lack of proper authentication