in 2009 that for what, 30 years of his life he worked in undercover. for the cia and for the fbi starting in about 2008. sean: okay. and in 2009. he had infiltrated and discovered that vladimir putin had operatives here in america. yes and putin wanted to control the world s uranium and one of the first steps was to buy uranium one to have his russian company buy uranium one. sean: your informant in 2009, long before a year and a half later this cfius board had approved uranium one sale. october of 2010. sean: he discovered putin s operatives in america involved in briberies, kick backs, extortion and racketeering. and wanting to control the world s uranium including the u.s. uranium. sean: america needs uranium, flight we don t have enough? we don t. and i did all this work for government two counsel bouts. he has luke. twice now justice department officials have given false
victoria toning joins us. he started in 2009 work undercover for the fbi. he went to work for the russian uranium industry. and al all of a sudden after two months there they said you have to take half of your salary left and gone about his business and made the full salary some place else. he decided to go to the fbi and let me tell you what s going on. and the fbi said well, will you continue to work for them, giving out half of your salary and report to us every single thing that s going on. not only just the briberies, but also what s going on in the russian nuclear industry. steve: sure. and ultimately what happened was the fbi knew about the corruption. knew about the connection to the clintons and, yet, they still approved it fast forward.
attorney general of the assistant attorney general that generates him. he will do that. in a nutshell, fred, any article impeachment would have to be drawn up in the house of representatives. they ll need the majority vote there and that ll mean just like in the indictment of charges being brought. the chief justice presides and they ll need a two-third of majority. whether of obstruction of justice under the version of high crimes misdemeanors, briberies and treasons we are not sure if he will be removed. fred, i am telling you and i listened to this entire week whether the or not the elements are there under determination of comey, there are there. i have seen cases with less
attorney general joyce stance. joyce, a big welcome to you. in your pvopinion, do you see a obstruction of justice? it highlights the need to have a good independent investigation because no prosecutor can assess potential charges until the facts are very clear. but from what we know at the moment, we have a situation very different from the situation involving former president clinton where there was testimonied under oath. it was alleged to have been improperly given. what we re looking at now is a situation that really doesn t fit neatly into the existence of obstruction of justice statutes. there s an entire series of law that covers obstruction. they weren t really written contemplating a situation involving the president and the head of the fbi. one law that may be at stake is the federal briberies statue. if there s a clear quid pro quo
international crisis to bring nationalistic sent meant to venezuela. what they re saying is he is using this to divert attention from the economic crisis that venezuela is going through. yeah. and the crisis of crime which is out of control there. let s talk about brazil. what sparked this massive demonstration? there were massive demonstrations, a huge problem for the president. hundreds of thousands of people out in the streets of brazil around the whole country, some of them even asking for impeachment. basically brazil has been going through a crisis of corruption scandal, bribery, and these crisis took place when the president was the head of this company. what people are saying is that she should have known about this crisis and these briberyies and taking place. she said she didn t know about the briberies taking place, and