sort of, judicial status quo by simply replacing kennedy with someone who is exactly like him. kavanaugh is not strictly constitutional way neil gorsuch has proven himself to be. kavanaugh was in favor of obamacare, he had a history of favoring the expansion of federal power over fourth amendment restrictions. and not only that, his reliance on precedent, shows us that he probably will not be the justice that will overturn roe versus wade or any other supreme court opinion that kavanaugh feels is settled law. outside liberal groups made so they really had to stop the kavanaugh nomination. was that necessary? no. i don t think so. i think this was all just political fervor. and i think the fact look at
about president trump. it will still be a major factor. it is going to be about the groups i have mentioned and may add one other big point. this election, more than any in recent memory, if you are a democrat we want all parties to take control of congress. if you are a republican want to make sure that our party retains the hold on congress. and that is dominating virtually everything. arthel: i want to refer to an article in the hill. mitch mcconnell is quoted saying quote - our bases on fire. and he is saying this while predicted not expecting votes against kavanaugh by democratic senators, joe donnelly, of indiana, heidi heitkamp of north dakota, claire mccaskill of montana and i mean missouri and then john tester of montana. will come back to bite them next month. that is with the senator saying. when they are up for reelection
motorcycle revving motorcycle revving motorcycle revving no matter who rides point, there are over 10,000 allstate agents riding sweep. and just like tyrone taylor, they know what it takes to help keep you protected. are you in good hands? mike: brett kavanaugh seated on the supreme court. conservatives now have a solid majority especially when it comes to contentious issues like abortion, gun rights and presidential powers. the justice kagan the hard brett kavanaugh which is demon of harvard law school says it
what susan collins said, proving that what we see here is a justice that was liberal enough for susan collins. and her statements of fact based on his historical judgments, i think prove to us that this was just a liberal left hysteria designed, not to legitimately oppose a candidate but to stir up their base for political and election purposes. and i think it is very sad to me to see people who are not aware of the facts, not aware of the way that kavanaugh actually voted and held in his opinions. opposing somebody that i think they re going in the end, actually approve of his opinions. mike: to expect any tension between kavanaugh and some of the more liberal members? absolutely not! this not political theater. what you have to get into the supreme court, you see history
of justices that work together. they actually are professional, they listen to judgments. we are not talking about kavanaugh sitting on the supreme court bench, being accused of criminal activity. something that he feels unjustly so you will not see that kind of response. and if we look historically, i mean look at the fact that antonin scalia and ginsberg, who have polarized ideologies in opposite directions, they were even reputed to be very good friends spending lots of personal time together. so this is not what people are expecting from you know, all of the political hype that we are seeing. kavanaugh is not going to upturn and become this outrageous, angry man on the bench. it is just not how the supreme