earlier in a particular case. is he adored by his colleagues. and he is one of the most fun people to be with and is he very, very fun even though he doesn t talk. neil: that s right. i forgot about that. one of the things i have heard about trying to pursue impeachment is that the judge kavanaugh perjured himself. i m not an alawyer or expert on these things, you are. i started to digging into this how purger himself. minimize how often he got drunk in high school. i m thinking to myself boy, are you kidding me? what did you make of that. my gosh, i thank god i m never going to be questioned about my drinking in high school and college. neil: don t go there we don t want to open a can of worms. that s really what it comes down. to say that s where he was not very honest or forthcoming about something he was doing in high school. well, i got the impression, listening to the hearings without the commentary that he liked beer and he drank a lot. i never had any different
all attention tonight on the president of the united states as he ceremonially swears in his choice for the u.s. supreme court. and he says is he looking forward to it. we will perform the swearing in 7:00 tonight at the white house. i leave here and guy home and swear in a man who will be a truly great united states supreme court justice. that s going to be my honor. neil: and it will be a big event 7:00 p.m. eastern. 3 hours from now. of course, fox news will be carrying that john roberts though, the real detail is justice kavanaugh is a justice now. and he is already doing some work, right? yeah. he went right to work at his chambers on sunday getting ready for the updodge week, neil. you don t want to miss a beat whether you have got a job that important. the president down there in orlando today for the international association of chiefs of police convention.
let s bring in all of the fact witnesses and ask them. remember, chuck grassley wanted a team to do it. mark davies tweeted last week confirm kavanaugh. not neutral. when the president says this guy s been investigated by the fbi meaning kavanaugh six times, what does that mean? one assumes that means they found his life upside down. that s a great question. here s how it works. when you ve done a federal judge five or six times and call spin, special inquiries, you work under screaming, brute call deadlines and what often happens is you re-up, re-do the credit and criminal. make sure he s not arrested for dui since last one. working in a new office. moved the house. do those neighbors. but you don t go back and start from ground zero. so if something were missed
much. we have to note, though, ali, if it were noel francisco this is somebody we mentioned before, who has said he doesn t support special investigations. people keep saying as it relates to brett kavanaugh, choose someone else from the federalist society. he is the one judge who has said a sitting president shouldn t be indicted. we have this crazy some connection between these two. happening going on. tornado by the same pressure. ding-ding-ding. there you go. we ll get to the other story of the day, a second woman is accusing president trump s supreme court nominee kavanaugh of sexual misconduct. but first, a reminder that sexual assault including rape is a common national problem. 1 in 6 american women is a victim of attempted or completed rape in her lifetime. wow. about 70% of rapes are not reported to the police. and 99% of rape perpetrators
on one in person use interview techniques, use the fact that if you lie to us it s a federal violation. much more serious issue. that s correct. and they need to be unleashed to do that. trey gowdy said this is not the kind of thing that the fbi does. even if you wanted to take the fbi out, we hear over and over that brett kavanaugh has a blemish free record, an upstanding citizen. then even if it s not the fbi s game, why wouldn t the senate judiciary committee said if he can clear brett kavanaugh who denies being there, why wouldn t they have him there? well, you are asking a ret call question appearing there s an agenda not bringing in the people they don t want to hear. right? so this is why we need neutral finders of fact so if we re not going do have the professional investigators from the federal bureau of investigation try at least to look like the semblance of a logical investigation and