evil. think about that word. and said those who supported me were complicit in evil. another democratic senator on this committee said, judge kavanaugh is your worst nightmare. a former head of the national committee said, judge kavanaugh will threaten the lives of millions of americans for decades to come. i understand the passions of the moment. but i would say to those senators, your words have meaning. millions of americans listen carefully to you. given comments like those, is it any surprise that people have been willing to do anything. to make any physical threat against my family. to send any violent e-mail to my wife. to make any kind of allegation
is that kavanaugh was the only person everyone trying to challenge the allegations, which i think is the role of miss mitchell. she did a couple things well, establishing possible political bias in the sense of the delay of the hearing. this ridiculous allegation that she was afraid to fly. she certainly blew that out of the water. and the elucidation of the issue of whether or not dr. ford delayed in her own word coming forward with the information. she said that she knew about brett kavanaugh s position on the short list and that she was determined to prevent his nomination. yet, somehow this ph.d. was unable to figure out how to call either of her two senators. both of whom sit on the judiciary committee. miss mitchell did a good job with that but when it came to asking about the allegations i was shocked when she told dr. ford she would not be asking her about the
a friend, i had no idea that was within brett kavanaugh. neither did i, quite frankly. when he came in, i was like, whoa! he didn t even look like the kavanaugh i met through the years and he was going to take this over himself. tucker: so you are a law professor and you have met him a number of times. the legal community in d.c. at the high levels are pretty smal small. is there a debate on left or right about his legal qualifications for this job? no.nspe he is highly respected and lawyers give him high marks as an appellate judge.. this is very uncharacteristic for him. he is not known as someone who is emotive, or gets angry. it s the contrary. he has a reputation being polite and civil to everyone. this was a genuine moment or uncharacteristic one for him. tucker: i wonder, since you have watched the confirmation hearings going back so far, they once took place on the level of the
means to do that. tucker: the duke lacrosse people who are director the mud and the prosecutor who lost his bar license. what about the kids in a fraternity that were accused of rating women? were they made hole? they had challenges, too. one group of students brought a lawsuit in the second circuit, in new york and it was dismissed. and, the rolling stones settled that case. it s a long process. it s unbelievable. 50 years ago that they would have been a liberal. thanks what you are doing. we really appreciate that. it s been an unbelievable day but it s not over. stay right here for continued coverage of brett kavanaugh and hearing that happened today, and we will be back tomorrow for the show that it s a sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group set.
us. they want individuals who look to the worst parts of themselves. to think awful things about other people. about, tucker, the very personal aspects of who we are. our gender, our race, our ethnicity. maybe ultimately our age. certainly gender. everything with kavanaugh certainly, maybe that is why the liberals have been inspired to go even further has been about the worst in what they want from people. arguing for division. looking for the emotional buttons to have people certainly be upset, to not trust their neighbor or even themselves. to really look at america again as being evil. this now is what the democrats have become. we saw it on display today. we have seen it destroy i don t think it s destroyed judge kavanaugh yet. obviously, dr. ford s life is changed forever. we all deserve better. and what we will not do is go back to that time in this