the project sponsor is not here. i live in this neighborhood and i am concerned about this because in my neighborhood, there is a lot of this already. there is too much that is here, and this may affect our children and our teenagers, because every morning they will pass by this, and there is something very interesting about this. there is something very interesting about this because it looks like this industry is very popular. i am concerned about this and this is still open. i am concern for my children and my teenager. thank you very much. is there any further public comment? the public comment is closed. i was going to move to approve. did we look at the issue about the oversaturation? under the previous ordnance that existed, there was a thousand ft proximity factor that went into play about the location. the principal use establishments, when this is the primary use of the facility. and there is also the excess reuse to be located without the thousand ft proxim
parcel. and we have tried to not block the windows of that property. i am available to answer any questions but wanted to bring up carly williams to talk briefly about this project. i am the current owner of the property and i am also the founding director of the capp street foundation. i would like to do that the property once the legal matters have taken care of, for the foundation to oversee this property. i wanted to give you a very brief history of how i got here. i have been on the board for a number of years, and it in late 2007 i was in the commission s meeting when the curator presented a sculpture by artist, david ireland. it had been traded at of a bottle of a matter of material that he found when he first came to this place in 1975. he wanted to incorporate this into his work. putting this in the context of the committee, she gave a brief background of the house, and at that time mr. island had moved away because of his health reasons and house was going to be
week. so, i would request that what we d have to do is let the people who attended the hearing know about this change. you would have to take a new action. the attorney says we can do that under one motion. we will continue to november 4. does the maker have to do that or can anyone? i think it was me. i think you were, also. item 10 was commissioner antonini. what we will do, november 4. i am going to move to rescend the continuance of items 10 and 11. this is to december 2nd and continue them to november 4th. seconded. and is there an agreement? the seconder of that motion was commissioner sugaya. that s me. i have a question. do we know if supervisor chu has set up a meeting. there is one on monday. just one other comment, if we need to continue this, we could. this may be ok. i just without the partys being present, we will go with that. there is a motion and a second to rescend this from the 2nd to november 4th. commissioners? aye. aye