but we are not going to hold our breath waiting for new the apologies. but joining me now is the fox news contributor editor at large at the spectator, as well as respect for the executive editor for the common sense society then. i think anglers, what them folks won t care most about is that the experts, the so-called experts are going to be held accountable for all the damage they have cause. how important is this given the fact that the house will be taken over by the republicans and new year? how important is that accountability? it is hugely important but i would not hold out hope. i think so many people got so fought over their skis and the claims that they had made in the attempt that they have made to smear you, and others like you who were saying the right thing at the time that they were all going in the opposite direction. they are also heavily invested in a narrative that is been shown to be false. they have shown should not lock up with the truth about the nature of desi
we re not going to holdolog our breath waiting for any of their apologies. buies. t me now has been diminished. fox news contributorat the and editor at large of s pectthe spectator, as well as cs bedford, the executive editor for the common sense society fo. ben, i think what the angler s folks most is what they care expe about is that the experts ,the so-called experts, areg tob going to be held accountable for all the damage they cost.pon how important is thit s, given the fact that the house will be taken over by the republicansbls and new year in the new year? how important is thatlity accountability? it s hugely important, buthold t i also wouldn t hold out hope. i think that so many people goto so far out ovever their skis ind the claims that they made and the attemptsade in t that td to smear you and others like you who were saying the right al thing at the time, that they were all going in the opposite direction. oppositthey re also heavily ind in a narrative that has been
that s really interesting. i don t know that doj ultimately will be interested in that because it s so difficult to prove. that s a new sort of element to the whole mix here. and elle, beyond trump they re considering how to hold republican lawmakers accountable for defying the subpoenas during the investigation, the lawmakers essentially thumbed their nose at the committee throughout this process. you and i get a subpoena, we comply with the subpoena. these lawmakers did not in some cases. what do you think is the most likely scenario? i m not holding my breath waiting for much from the committee here. the reality, as much good and important and tough work as the committee has done, they ve gone light on their colleagues. there s no way around that. they subpoenaed kevin mccarthy, jim jordan, three other members of the house who blew off those subpoenas. other people who defied the subpoenas were referred for criminal attempt. steve bannon is going to serve jail time because he di
matt walsh, great to see you the only thing you were called out repeatedly by name. not just matt walsh. matt walsh is responsible for the mass murder. now that we learned what we learned last night, how do you assess them? well, i mean, we re all owed apologies but i m not going to i ve seen these people enough knowing i m not going to sit around and hold my breath waiting. it s really kind of amazing to watch this. especially the clip you played of cnn where they immediately just deny this person s self-identity and the point we want to get across is if you re on the left, okay, you can t do that. that is not available to you. you re not allowed to do that by your own precedent tucker, we can say that s nonsense and nonbinary s, you can t even be that.
i don t if he has the capacity grass, but certainly something he did not have the capacity to understand. my initial reaction is that that was tone-deaf, but it s beyond the pale. that is how hypocritical that he would make a statement that he saying given the position on which he stands. good point you make that one, don. but about with you, susan, i mean this guy is a senator from alabama. why is he in a bad in the first place? what is the strategy behind that? by the way, should we bother holding our breath waiting for every republican senator to disavow those remarks fully without reservation? is that going to happen? it won t happen. they will dance around it, we heard some of it on the sunday show today. make it clear, alex, he sounds like he was leading a planned rally. full stop. that is the language he was using. for good reason. how harmful, david, could this be for republicans?