states and advising consent responsibilities need to understand their things in this record that are troubling for. i m just curious do you think there s going to be the acrimony we have seen some of these past nomination processes? not brett kavanaugh that was over-the-top. but it seems to me like a lot of republicans of kinda withheld their opinion in this it doesn t really change the balance of the court is still six three she is a liberal your final thoughts. ask the idiotic wsrc version of senate confirmation hearings for the supreme court have been getting stupider and stupider since the 1980s so the stuff they tried to do it to brett kavanaugh s wife and kids were just unconscionably wicked. part of a pattern s been going on for 30 years people i want us to that judge jackson s judicial policy i went own attacks or as a human. what is to be having a debate about her what her judicial philosophy is. it s because you don t confuse yourself of the super legislature we need to k
standing ovation but i want to move out if i can the supreme court nomination hearings for judge braxton jackson josh hawley said this about that s our time judge jackson has a padded leading child pouring offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes both as a judge in a policy maker white house policy overwhelming majority of jackson cases involve crimes the sentences were consistent with or above the government are u.s. probation recommended, where do you stand on this? supreme court justices get lifetime tenure. before that happens there needs to be a vigorous, or rigorous vetting of their records. there are things in judge jackson s records that are troubling i m glad we have a confirmation in starting tomorrow afternoon. tomorrow morning i guess i hope judge jackson will be very forthcoming and transparent the american people on the united