you sound like you ve just talked yourself into voting yes on our air. no. because we ve got to make sure this deal is not binding on future administrations. because next decade, iran gets to build an allegedly peaceful program. just the crumbs will be enough to build several nuclear weapons. what i m saying is for the next year and a half, maybe we should prevent the president from carrying out his policy which has pluses and minuses and to go war with the president while we re trying to deal with randle at the same time. but we ve got to make sure this deal is not morally or reasonably binding. we ll have to go back with this or that and turn it back. you have accepted limits for ten years. they have to be skenlded. there is been a lot about the
today? and i don t think we have an effective plan for the next year and a half that works better than stepping good parts of the deal that the president has negotiated. you sound like you ve just talked yourself into voting yes on our air. no. because we ve got to make sure this deal is not binding on future administrations. because next decade, iran gets to build an allegedly peaceful program. just the crumbs will be enough to build several nuclear weapons. what i m saying is for the next year and a half, maybe we should prevent the president from carrying out his policy which has pluses and minuses and to go war with the president while we re trying to deal with randle at the same time.
negotiated. you sound like you ve just talked yourself into voting yes on our air. no. because we ve got to make sure this deal is not binding on future administrations. because next decade iran gets to build an allegedly peaceful program. just the crumbs will be enough to build several nuclear weapons. what i m saying is for the next year and a half maybe we should prevent the president from carrying out his policy which has pluses and minuses and to go war with the president while we re trying to deal with randle at the same time. but we ve got to make sure this deal is not morally or reasonably binding. we ll have to go back with
i could see a price. got kicked out many times and got blank screens some peoplewam some of my constituents because we start ad page on our facebook and on twitter. we are collecting what is called share with scalise. people are sending us stories. we re getting lots of stories from my constituents. i want to read awe few of them. randle from mandeville, my health care premium went up 30%, to over $350 a month increase. we had michelle from slidell, our insurance premiums are going up $400 a month and our deductible has increased. then you ve got sean from covington, my current plan through united health care is no longer being offered in 2014 due to obamacare. in fact i received a stating that the new health care law was reason for removal of my current health care plan. madam secretary what would you tell sean who liked his plan and has lost it and promised by you and president would be able to keep the plan. what would you tell sean now that he lost his plan?
next generation has nothing to look forward to, when you have kids graduating without jobs, home owners foreclosuring, people trying to make their ends meet from paycheck to paycheck, the grownups do need to show up, and the discussion i ve been involved with the last couple of months has been exciting about that. do you feel the outcome i feel i m glad we have multiple parties and partisan discussions, i m glad there s an opportunity to sharpen our thinking and arguments about different world views, but i think that is something that definitely happens in these discussions. it does. you sharpen the differences. all the discussions the last couple of months, do you feel the conversations ever end with okay, we agree on that or we agree to move forward. a few of them do, a few of them do. for example, governor randle and i understand the politics well but we also recognize something very fundamental that when you