Perform at a slower intact inches from the water. The pier 70 for City Developments this is a mixed use Development Project this project includes a number of Sea Level Rise mitigation measures the New Buildings will be accommodate 5. 5 Sea Level Rise, the bay trail would allow for 2 feet of Sea Level Rise plus future total water levels, the design zone between the waters edge will be at a lower level as they conform but still meets the 2050 Sea Level Rise and important further rising the long term. Seawall lot 337 commission rock the giant proposed development at this point this development is planning on incorporating 55 inches of Sea Level Rise this was considered through the for the 21 hundred scenario at the time of tied as we move forward the teaches adaptation measures we can incorporate will depend on how fast Sea Level Rise and the extent interim flood managements measures can include relocating the utilities to the topside when the utilities are located underneath the piers th
And i am really as john stated, i was for, and i am a supporter of washington, and i was a supporter of the mills corporation, and i was cheered when we chose the development for the building and for the renovation of pier one and for the wonderful projects that we do have along the water front and while, we are not always right on everything as you said, we are not always going to agree. But, what we have accomplished over the last 17 years, i just want to applaud everybody in this room for being a part of it. I cannot even count the number of meetings for the pier 7 on, sea wall 337, and i know that she does not have a full time job, because she is so busy working for the port and all of our efforts and, i just feel so much pride in the legacy that has been developed over the last 20 years, to make the water front what it is today. And i think that we have done an amazing job of community out reach. Of meeting with anyone who has, or who wants to understand anything about what is goi
An amazing job of community out reach. Of meeting with anyone who has, or who wants to understand anything about what is going on with the water front. And so i do believe that the boaters have made a statement and i do believe that maybe, there are some things that we could do differently, and i just dont want to take away from the amazing work that this team has done and created along the water front, thank you. Commissioner woo ho . I am going to take a different tact, and i certainly dont take away and i think that it is an amazing work that we have done so far and it is great to understand, what we have accomplished and what brad and diane have done a great job, and we are trying to look forward and have the speakers address what we want to accomplish, and first of all i have learned on the commission that every citizen believes that they own the water front in San Francisco. And that is a hard one for us as a commission to meet everybodys needs and desires. And i have come to res
Project and the pier, 43, and the other projects have not been. As successful. The warriors project, and it drew a lot of controversy, the people wanted to talk about the other locations, not on the port property. And the americas cup initially envisioned the Long Term Development rights which did not come to pass. And there was a proposal for the International Museum of women at pier 26 which was a soul source authorization for the board of supervisors and so the report tries to take stock of the unique opportunities that did not go forward. And draw lessons learned, for the public, to think about as well as the Port Commission, and when we have done the same with the Development Projects that did not go for ward. All of who are implementing the projects port wide and, the ports engineering division, rebuilds the two piers before two major fires and pier 48, and pier, 29, and both of those were about 15 Million Dollar projects and the pier, 29 project has rebuilt from the original pla
Creek. And importantly, we are thinking that our recommendation today, is that leasing historic piers for more than 35 years, without a Sea Level Rise strategy is no longer advisable. So, this is the last of our recommendations, and it really goes to what we suggest for planning Going Forward. We think that in order to balance state and local interests, in the water front, where there is planning Going Forward, we need to invite bcdc and the state lands to participate in the process. Much in the way that we are seeing with the bcdc port working group. Given our recommendation that we do the subarea planning and the discreet areas of the water front, rather than the whole water front as was the case with the adoption of the water front land use, and there is a lot of efforts in the projects that are under way and those projects need to continue while the planning discussions occur and looking at the discreet water front subareas, we have planning under way in both the fixer mans wharf a