indictment. and then it says and then subject to indictment, trial and prosecution. now i indictment, trial and prosecution. now i would say that clearly contemplates that a president, out of office. contemplates that a president, out of office, can be prosecuted for crimes of office, can be prosecuted for crimes committed while in office. i don t crimes committed while in office. i don t think crimes committed while in office. i don t think it requires impeachment to come don t think it requires impeachment to come first, like sequentially. so ithink to come first, like sequentially. so i think that s the beginning and the end, i think that s the beginning and the end. i i think that s the beginning and the end. ithink i think that s the beginning and the end, i think donald trump will lose in surrogate court, probably unanimously, and if this goes to the supreme unanimously, and if this goes to the supreme court as i think it will, most supreme court as i think it w
impeachment, not be prosecuted, would be able to order the assassination of one of his political opponents. avoid prosecution, not get prosecuted. they were producing some examples they thought would make an a mockery of what natural justice they thought would make an a mockery of what naturaljustice would suggest. but on the other hand, donald trump s lawyers were pointing out, and i think this has some force as well, that the president does have to have some latitude of movement, some latitude of operation. 0therwise, movement, some latitude of operation. otherwise, there would be a constant cycle of people going after their opponents once they are out of office. the expectation is, gary, that it would go all the way to the supreme court come of this. does the supreme court have to take it up? does the supreme court have to take it u - ? ., ., , , does the supreme court have to take itu? ., ., , , ., it up? no, it doesn t. it gets to ick and it up? no, it doesn t. it gets to pick
for years, the post office had denied that remote access to branch accounts was possible. in 2015, in written evidence to a select committee inquiry, the company said. but that wasn t true. the post office only admitted it was in fact possible when it was left with no choice during a high court case in 2019. michael rudkin, who was formerly the union rep with the national federation of sub postmasters, visited the fujitsu s bracknell office back in 2012 and was amazed to discover what access the team had. my chaperone actually started to alter some of the figures in branch of an office. i wish to this day that i d recorded which office it was, but nonetheless i saw what i saw, i made the comment, is this in real time? he said, yes.
respect to those allegations were made today in court. the respect to those allegations were made today in court. made today in court. the special counsel s office made today in court. the special counsel s office said made today in court. the special counsel s office said it made today in court. the special counsel s office said it would - made today in court. the special counsel s office said it would be | counsel s office said it would be awfully scary if it couldn t prosecute cases like trump s, if there was no mechanism to keep presidents from reserving the vote and remaining in power. were it not for the advice of white house counsel, donald trump might have done that. i counsel, donald trump might have done that. . ., , counsel, donald trump might have done that. , , ., ., done that. i could see how an international done that. i could see how an international audience - done that. i could see how an international audience might | done that. i could see how an - internat
the union representing the postmasters say they believe not only did fujitsu have access to the accounts, they could change them in real time. and more problems for boeing. both united and alaska say their mechanics have found loose bolts on a number of their 737 max 9s the same aircraft that had a door plug blowout mid flight over oregon last week. good evening. the decision which rests with the us appeals court in washington dc, is of fundemental importance, and not only to the 2024 election. the three judges must decide whether a us president, by virtue of the office he holds, is entitled to exceedingly broad protections from criminal prosecution, for statements and actions taken while in office. should donald trump be excused from the actions he took to overturn the 2020 election. and was his challenge,