With San Francisco public works. And thomas rouitman and the project managers from San Francisco public works. And the Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. The board requests that you turn off or silence all phones and other Electronic Devices so they will not disturb proceedings. Appellant and permit holders and respondents are each given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes are rebuttal. And members of the public who are not with the party have three minutes to address the board and no rebuttal. Time may be limited to two minutes if the agenda is large or a large number of speakers. Our legal clerk will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before your time is up. Four votes are to have an appeal or other city determination. If you have questions about a rehearing and please email board staff at boardo boardofappealing sfgovtv. Org. And every effort has been made to replicate the inperson hearing process. To enable Public Participation sfgovtv is broadcasting and
One moment. Miss boller, you can go ahead. You have three minutes, please. Okay. Caller hello . Clerk hello, miss boller, welcome. Caller thank you. Im calling because theres been an incident on octavia street of tree cutting that was has greatly upset the residents because they expected that an agreement made with the board of appeals was being followed. And it wasnt. They were supposed to come to an agreement as to the replacement of trees and what which trees would be which kinds of trees would be replaced. And that agreement was not reached. Everybody was taken by great surprise that suddenly on saturday that a crew came and took down four trees. And then i think on monday an additional tree im not sure where those were on octavia street. The other one might have been on hayes street. And now apparently its been decided to stop doing it. But i think that its very unfortunate and illegitimate for those trees to be taken down. And theres no putting them back. You just cant move them
Everything here. John 3 16, god loves everybody. You walked right into it. Pete when does it end . It ends on the 6th of so lets remember agape love during this season, and that way january. Thats the day the when this terror hits, well kaines. We is great . Know what to do. Lets come together with sanity, our house. Like another christmas. Rational thought and love and if begin to resolve these problems. Rachel absolutely love coming together, all good messages. Some people are saying especially based on the shooting that we saw and the response in pete hanukkah. Texas that we should also be rachel or convert. Dean i say if it works take prepared. Heres the statement from Governor Greg Abbott in texas. It. He says places of worship are urge. Pete excited to have you meant to be sacred, and im here. Big guests on the program. Grateful for the Church Members at 8 00 a. M. Secretary of who acted quickly to take down the shooter and prevent further state mike pompeo. Plenty of things goin
Garage or driveway is a most common example. There is a big way, if the tree can be removed and replaced, we just do we cant do the appraised value because we are not losing a planting site. We are working on actually tightening up our code a little bit to beef it up in the phase of development. Right now, one of the other triggers, when there is traction triggers that reek wire Tree Planting, linear frontage. One tree, or in lieu fee is required per 20 feet of frontage area typical 25 foot wide singlefamily home reek is the tree or in lieu fee. Lets say there are no trees that require planting one tree. That is not triggered with this particular application. If it was we would be looking at all frontages of the entire parcel and add up 20 linear feet and figure out if they are short trees are yet it is Development Impact fee. Again, the average house requires one. That is a trigger that does not involve, or is in play here, but that is in play for driveways. I dont know if ive answere
Presentation again. Its confusing. I read this and i was appalled. Because what i see, because i have a background a little bit in commercial real estate sure. I see upper plaza looking to enhance the value of their property selfishly, and i say that again, selfishly. This one has the value of the building because they can bring customers to upper plaza while people are charging their cars, they can sell more condos or rent more apartments or have more people come to the movies or retail or whatever. So i see that. And then i see tesla having a convenient location, im not doubting your points of view, to sell more cars. And then i see the citizens of the city of San Francisco compromised because they lose more trees in an already overly deforested canopy. I dont get it. I dont get it at all. And then you didnt answer the question or the question that i heard. Did you look at other sites in San Francisco that would not deforest San Francisco, that would not result in compromising the ur