and it s just like you re always reading on politicians, p politicians who don t pay their taxes. i think you re right. i pay minmi afterwards, e, whatever , whoever. but a lot of them don t owe me. a lot of them don t know it s this episode has revealede a lot to a lot of people about how these politicians behave, how arrogant they are entitled h . they are entitled, they feel. ow and then e of course you turn to the matter the cdc that youu just mentioned. yes, that s a wonderful example . there s other things about hypocrisy, right? the cdc thing is about. two other things about it s about incompetence because the one thing you know i about agencies like the cdc is they gather a lot of data. yes.ey and do a poor job of getting it organized, checked, collated and issued in a way that s meaningful. yes.s.s on top of that , though, we o found out in this episode that they were concerned about data particularly related to 18 to 49 year olds. i think that was the age groupo and the eff
the world leaders had to implement it. , ., ~ the world leaders had to implement it. let s talk about the proposed coal mine it. let s talk about the proposed coal mine in it. let s talk about the proposed coal mine in cumbria, it. let s talk about the proposed coal mine in cumbria, the i it. let s talk about the proposed coal mine in cumbria, the prime minister said a couple of days ago for the first time on record that he does not want to see a tap in but it is up to local planning officials, and also the kampl oilfield off shetland. you must have concerns about these projects alongside what the uk says it wants to do. the cambo oilfield. if we open == the uk says it wants to do. the cambo oilfield. if we open- the uk says it wants to do. the cambo oilfield. if we open if we o ten a cambo oilfield. if we open if we open a minefield cambo oilfield. if we open if we open a minefield it cambo oilfield. if we open if we open a minefield it is cambo oilfield.
complete verifiable aniable denuclearization of north korea. no one would say it wasn t historic but, one, what did we get out of it. what donald trump was saying was troubling, especially when he was so tough with the g7 members earlier this week and so kind of embracing with kim jong un. when you played the clip of owe o otto warmbier s parents, that was recent. women stay with me. i want to talk about vulgar attacks that are only playing in the president s hands. if you teach someone to fish
a process for investigating any kind of in complete fisa affidavit or inaccurate fisa affidavit. if the bowe o the bureau has done that, the house does have a process to investigate it, identify any gap in the investigation, rectify any problems with the affidavit with the court, and then doll out discipline as needed. and that is something that the house intel committee is able to do, can do and has done in the past. this immediately makes me a little bit more curious into carter page. why is there so much emphasis around what the fbi could have acquired through their fisa coverage on carter page. is that the ultimate concern here that there was additional intelligence gathered through his fisa coverage that could be concerning to the investigation.
american taxpayers so there are a number of proposals. what we really need is the white house to get behind some of the campaign promises that the president made. but a number of bills that not only increase coverage but also go to costs. how do you get them to vote? how do you get leadership to try to get these in front of committees? i think we ve tried. we o re working with the colleagues. we have republican rank and support. how do we get the republican leadership to allow them for a vote and the only way that s going to happen is if the white house comes out for some of these things. the interesting point is why does the president campaign for going after hospital fees and if the white house were to say look, we re going to try to fulfill some of these campaign promises there are bipartisan