then? on their trucks? they re self-insured because there are ways around that. if the post office take this example, their driver had a tendency to be drunk and should have pulled him off the road, the same with police officers. if they re a predilection to problems we know about prior, then the post office could be responsible. so there s so many little weird ins and outs. but the reality is their drivers, in this case they claim they re a red light and some violations. you know what drives me absolutely bonkers? when i m looking for a parking spot and there s a guy with a diplomat plate who parks in front of a fire hydrant. forget it. diplomatic immunity you can t get past that for a second. bothal immunity? the government has almost the same exact situation. if i get the spot he can run
postal service as well as amazon. is there some meat on this bone? there is the issue of his claim that actually amazon is taking advantage of a low cost or lower cost than it should be from the u.s. postal service. go ahead seung min. first of all, since it has been brought up, i want to stress at that the washington post is a independent news organization. i think what the president has done here is brought up some sort of he has been kind of misleading about what he said about the retailer. clearly in the 45 states that do have a sales tax amazon pays sales taxes in those areas as well and the bothal service contracts with amazon have been profitable. i think what we are looking at right now, what members of congress and the prodder public are looking at statements from the white house saying there are