look, i think what gets lostis here is people think this is anti trans. they think this is taking away opportunities from trans women to compete. no, no, no. it s maintaining the fairness for biological women to compete as jill biden said recently, that they fought so hard for with title nine . there needs to be another th option for trans athletes. mplea s simple as that.there be they know should there be a trans category? no. you don t think they should compete against each other? separatey . i think we ve got categories that encompass everyone t on earth. we have sports are designated by categories. that s how we allow forr inclusion in sports . sports. and there s a protected categories. and then there s a category fo r n and anyone who doesn t fit in the protected categories. this is a good segue way. goo this week, the biden administration is proposing a change in titl e nine . title nine was created to protect women, particularly
is an off ramp for anythin about abortion and the situationally avoid lettin women know that they have th option to have an abortion they basically shone peopl into adoption and or other options to guarantee that they give birth judge has merrick has been a long time volunteer in tha movement i think the supreme court has series of off-ramps here, no just because of his language but to michelle s point, the decision is wholly outcome determinant on a number of legal issues like standing whether the plaintiff exhaustive, their rabbit ears. this is a 23 year old approval by the fda one might question why didn they sooner. there s a number of places where the supreme court coul take a convenient off ramp without even having to go into the really complex and partisa issues of abortion if they r willing to take it the other thing i would say is this decision is antithetica to dobbs itself. there is a number of pro-choic attorney generals who filed
week filed paperwork for a possible reelection bid. the filings don t guarantee he will run but it keeps th option opening a representative santos is being investigated by house ethics committee for allegedly lyin about his background and mishandling campaign money you know new york politics, yo know it well if santos does run again, ar democrats ready to challenge him? while, rev i don t think i kno it s nearly as well as you d but i will give you my two cents. there is zero chance tha george santos wins in 2024 i would offer that it incredibly unlikely that h even went to the republica primary. this is not about either o those two things this is about one george santo personal business model. this is about him being and no a part of the foundation of th
example of this common pattern that we have now been discussin which is the total erosion of four citizens that pay their taxes and lived in the cities o their safety, of their infrastructure, of their way of life and likelihood being threatened and local and state officials continue to do nothing , but hold pressers. every now and again, elected officials do what they promise they re going to do, it does happen sometimes, like in california they promised to be soft on crime, they promised to decriminalize shoplifting. the list of crimes they re goin to actually enforce it shorter than the list, but they re just going to wave at, so i hate it for the victims, i hate it for the law-abiding citizens, but every now and then you get what you elect and that s what they ve done in california. part of the issue is that th option is just a buffet of socialism. so it s difficult to even find candidates that represent simpl