if it is not being policed in the same way? i actually think there is less these days because we have eliminated so many of the bots which were pushing scams and spam. previous management turned a blind eye to the bots because their bonuses were tied to user growth, and if your competition is tied to user growth, then you re not going to look too closely at some of the users. that is part of the problem. so i think there is less misinformation because we don t have the bot problem that we used to. we also have given a lot of attention to community notes which corrects, the community itself corrects misinformation, and it has been very effective. i would onlyjust add that we have spoken people who have been sacked that used to be in, content moderation and we ve spoken to people very recently that have been involved in moderation, and they say there is not enough people to police the stuff
which were pushing scams and spam. previous management turned a blind eye to the bots because their bonuses were tied to user growth, and if your competition is tied to user growth, then you re not going to look too closely at some of the users. that is part of the problem. so i think there is less misinformation because we don t have the bot problem that we used to. we also have given a lot of attention to community notes which corrects, the community itself, corrects misinformation, and it has been very effective. i would onlyjust add that we have spoken people who have been sacked that used to be in, content moderation and we ve spoken
previous management turned a blind eye to the bots because their bonuses were tied to user growth and death your competition is tied to user growth then you re not going to look too closely at some of the users, that is part of the problem. so i think there is less dense information because we have the bot problem that we used to. unreal so had given a lot of attention to community notes which corrects, that when community itself corrects misinformation and it has been very effective. ., ., , , ., effective. and have only ust add that we have i effective. and have only ust add that we have spoken effective. and have onlyjust add that we have spoken people - effective. and have onlyjust add that we have spoken people whoj effective. and have onlyjust add - that we have spoken people who have been sacked that used to being content moderation and we ve spoken to people very recently have been involved in moderation they say is not enough people to police the stuff particularly aroun
all of us are going to billy joel. that s a great show by the way. i ve gone, that s why we re going again. diana ross, billy joel, i m old. if whitney were and or michael jackson, i would be going. lawmakers, though, it s not just everyone complaining on twitter, lawmakers are also saying we ve been highlighting this problem for a long time. and they have. i think that s a great point. i spoke to diana moss, the president of the american anti-trust institute. she said there are a few things that need to happen here. one, there needs to be an anti-trust opened at the d.o.j. and, two, legislatively there are things in terms of policy that could be done in terms of rules of the road, ticketing transparency, in terms of dealing with the bot problem, just addressing the resale market. i think, look, there is a lot of pent-up demand for concerts
the idea of what will this company be like, if you re once it. and it s only 2000 people working there, i mean, that really is a skeleton crew by twitter s standards. and he s gonna do all the things that he says he wants to do, he s gonna fight the auto made span bot problem. he s gonna create some kind of super a version of this thing, he s gonna need a lot of people. so putting all these, folks and making all these promises, i don t see how those go together. the white house is set to be considering security reviews of his ventures, including twitter. walk us through this, and specifically. could this end up being the greatest golden parachute ever for musk, the white house takes a close look, they look at his involvement, they look at his communications with putin. they say, you know, we ve got trust issues here. we re not gonna let it happen. and musk gets the deal of the century. he gets to walk away from this bad dream, and not actually have to buy by the company. you know,