Eyeopener. Emily 6 00 a. M. Also on the eye this morning, at first glance you might not notice but that is not a diamond. The Engagement Ring taking a bite out of tradition ahead. You get it . Do you guys get it . Cindy i get it unfortunately. Im going to stop there. Emily good morning. Im emily riemer. Randy and im randy price with cindy fitzgibbon. That ring is smiling at you. Cindy clever. There you go. Out the door. So layers are key today because its going to warm up wonderfully this afternoon. You can see the sun there starting to get close to the horizon. 6 20 officially the sunrise. The kids will want a jablght at the bus stop this morning. Lots of low 40s. Upper 60s though as theyre getting off the bus this afternoon. Lots of sunshine today. Right now temperatures are in the upper 30s in beverly. Were 45 worcester. 47 in boston but look at orange. Below freezing. Norwood is at freezing. Were running in the mid 30s from new bedford down to the cape. The vineyard as well. Plymou
, all of growth that does set a slower, more sustainable trajectory is in the u. S. Interest, and i say that for several reasons. One is i do agree with the fundamental assessment that the current strategy has played itself out. The implications for social and political stability, and stability in the domestic context is certainly in our interest. I think also they are projecting that the vision includes a more integrated china with the world economy. I think certainly that is an americas longterm interest. So i think bottom line is we have a national interesting, ber interests, the leadershipses is assessment that they need to change that ever economic model. Now, chris had reverended some new considerations with respect to xi zhengping and the current leadership. I think one very significant change, structurally in the decisionmaking process is been the reemerge ends, not that it was ever dormant, but the party under xi, as he projects it will play a much larger role than it has in t
Families. Cspan2 will have live coverage of his comments. After tonights remarks, the president leaves for a weeklong asian trip stopping in japan, the philippines, malaysia, and south korea. Those visits were originally planned for last october, but canceled due to the government shutdown. Back in washington, governor Chris Christie speaks at the new Jersey Chamber of commerce congressional dinner tonight. Our live coverage starts at 7 15 p. M. And at 8 00 p. M. , three prominent whistle blowers, daniel heburg, who broke the pentagon paper story, thomas drake, a former National Security Agency Senior executive who was prosecuted as a spy, and a former Justice Department ethics whistleblower all talk about challenges they face exposing wrongdoing. Heres a brief portion of tonights program. Snoweden snowden, i believe, looked at these examples, looked at chelsea manning, look at aage and realized he had to be out of the country if he was going to put out this amount of information and b
Cost is always going to be an issue. It is pretty straightforward and pretty simple. Dollars how many of you all in journalism say follow the money. It is about the money, and people are going to make choices and make decisions about whether or not to do things the cousin of how it affects their bottom line. E need to understand that we need to also understand that sometimes it is going to cost them money if they do not make these changes, and sometimes they can make changes that improve safety and improved efficiency. It is all about having a dialogue and making sure people understand that. It does not have to be an eitheror, that people will be driven by money. Our own government is driven by costbenefit analysis. There are a lot of recommendations we have issued that have not gone anywhere because the costand if it does benefit doesost not support them. It does come down to money. With respect to the relationship, we have to have a balance of people who understand the industry, who
Against democracy. Its flawsble that it does. We have rejected that view. Communists were entitled to say this democratic system does not work, lets get rid of it. That took a good while for that idea, because there were laws against anarchy and edition. It takes us perhaps i think to the 1964 ruling of the Supreme Court on the New York Times v. Sullivan. You spoke about libel. In this particular ruling, very specific regulation that is the wrong word but concepts are written into this ruling. Would like to read what Justice Brennan has said because i think it deserves to be quoted as often as possible. Public discussion is a political duty, and it must be uninhibited, robust, and wide open and may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. You were mentioning this in a sense a moment ago. I am wondering, Justice Scalia, if this kind of an issue were brought before the court today, at that time, in 1964, i believe the co