prohibited. that s somebody somewhere putting their thumb on the scale of the algorithm, and that s why i m concerned. they re even rigging the ai. yeah. how do you feel about that? they get into everything, geraldo. kamala harris speechwriter, thank got they got ai now. solves that problem. you know, my late great former wrote a book back in 1952, player piano, in which he created a world where the bots, the ai ran everything, every aspect of life, very ominous and all pervasive. what i think about pit i mean, i was flattered by the shot that looked like robert downy jr. with a mustache, but greg made me think about another aspect of it, what about the replacement of real relationships? what happens when people start marrying their bots, start having real relationships, where you see the kids now with the
a j dd vance helped along the lines of getting an endorsement from and getting the votes of trump supporters. what is interesting now, he wants to be he wants to win this ohio he wants to win the race and also selling a book back in 2016 when he would come on. david mentioned the economy and so on. i wonder what this draft or what happens with s skoe scotis draf. what will happen? what effect will it have on these races? yeah, i don t think either side frankly can say anything about how it affects turnout. we re talking about a midterm election cycle. i think one thing is clear. what it helps do is sharpen the contrast between the political parties going into this fall. that is actually something that democrats have been trying to
worthy on more than one topic. before covid shut down the u.s., back in 2020 some warnings proved correct. you wrote a memo about the risk of a worst case pandemic scenario. why weren t you listened to more? interestingly, tony fauci is a key person that wouldn t listen to a word i had to say. i think that i had the benefit of knowing communist china of basically writing a book back in 2006 that predicted there might be a pandemic from communist china. in trump time, talks about all the people in the west wing who were really tone deaf to the crisis. you know, i can t explain why they thought that way. i do know that there was three people in the white house were taken it seriously with robert o bryan, national security advisor, myself and yes,
court is denied. can the supreme court do that in a case that is this prominent with the former president, or will they be concerned that the 75 million or so trump voters would feel as though donald trump was somehow slighted by the supreme court, not given his rights? yes, they can do. it i suspect they. we ll of course, this face the same decision back in december, and january to the united states supreme court. it was that one sentences denial that you are referring to. one of the greatest legal scholars, alexander because, wrote a book back in the 1960s saying, the supreme maintains legitimacy by often denying cases and saying we are not going to hear them, but otherwise it puts them in a political bigot. this is not a strong claim by