the planning commission discussed it a december have differs ever does 15 this and public comment is open today. more information from staff? i think, because i saw that same article, it s essentially the equivalent of a neighborhood-planned e.i.r. which allows projects to do what we call community planning exemption. in some cases those projects would have to do a supplemental or what we sometimes call focus e.i.r. i think that s it. but i will confirm it. commissioner sugaya: thank you. president miguel: commissioner moore? commissioner moore: i am glad to see a term sheet was submitted for the america s cup and hope we will find and ongoing dialogue about how to get the best out of that city wide planning. president miguel: since we last had public comment, i would like to mention i met with people regarding the booker t. washington project, cpmc. i was at the planning department out of the south mission surveys, the stark area, which was quite nicely attended, as far as
discretionary review. and 7c is a question for variance from planning code section 132. item 8 is case 2010.0676c, 445-447 sutter street, request for conditional use authorization for a massage establishment. item 9 is case number 2005.0963e, crystal springs pipeline number 2 replacement project. this is certification of the final environmental impact report. commissioners, it s my understanding that item 7, a commissioner has questions regarding it, which would pull it off of the concept calendar. with that, commissioners, you would consider items 6, 8, and the or the consent calendar. president miguel: any public comment? if not, public comment is closed, commissioner moore? commissioner moore: i questioned item 7 to be pulled. i think it would be to the benefit of everybody to have staff take us through the cases. and i have received a letter et regarding the citizenry project. perhaps staff can comment on it. this is, again, a critical issue, because on the massage par
money may go away, and we are still fighting for it. we have not given it up completely, but we are going to take some existing job-training money and redirected and realign it so we can keep roughly 470 slots available to those families that would otherwise lose their jobs. the hope is that roughly half of those 4000-plus families will keep their jobs because a private employer will keep them on, particularly through the holidays because so many of those jobs are in the service industry. in january, to make sure we can build that bridge, we are going to create some incentives and open up the opportunity for folks to continue to get some benefit for continuing to employ some of these individuals so they can support their families. it requires us to redirect about $9 billion that we will be asking the board of supervisors to help us redirect. the other money was going out anyway, but not totally dissimilar programs. we think the best job training is on the job training. we thi