when you look at the facts here, at least to the extent that we have seen in this indictment. what the government is alleging it can prove, it seems quite clear this is a strong case, if i can remember seeing, for piercing the attorney client privilege. and when she gets down to considering the fact, she will have to rule the same way the judge in d.c. did. as we are speaking about lawyers, and evan corcoran in particular, it strikes me as in a word, bonkers, that this person has offered the most damning evidence in this mar-a-lago indictment, and continues to represent donald trump in the january 6th probe that is launched by the special counsel s office. does that strike you as odd? i think bonkers is the perfect way to describe this. i don t really know what to make of it. as a lawyer, you have ethical obligations. the bar, in the state where your barleson s issued, certainly will hold you accountable if you violate those rules.
but there s still avenues to try to attack that. we are in a different circuit, and that decision was made in a pre-indictment posture. so perhaps trump s lawyers will get some traction, legally. when you look at the facts here, at least to the extent that we have seen in this indictment. what the government is alleging it can prove, it seems quite clear this is a strong case, if i can remember seeing, for piercing the attorney client privilege. and when she gets down to considering the fact, she will have to rule the same way the judge in d. c. did. as we are speaking about lawyers, and evan corcoran in particular, it strikes me as in a word, bonkers, that this person has offered the most damning evidence in this mar-a-lago indictment, and continues to represent donald trump in the january 6th probe that is launched by the special counsel s office. does that strike you as odd? i think bonkers is the perfect way to describe this.
well, by the way, cnn tonight, they actually had a rather muted response. what i don t think it s going to be a long lasting problem for his campaign. it s already up and running . he ll move on to other things. perhaps this will be a metaphor we do not know. but the biggest day is tomorrow. i think we will quickly forget about this. elon musk, a twitter situation, charlie, i agree. they re so bitter. they re so angry. it s really if there s no other reason to love this, it s to watch those people get so upset about this. they weren t upset. they were like, i don t think it matters that it was glitchy. i think they re just they re annoyed that ron desantis is young. it has a young family. he s in our accomplished a lot and he drives the left in his state. absolutely. bonkers. that s why they despise him. but i mean, they re not going to criticize him as some glitch in twitter. i mean, it s i mean, they were
greatest hollywood drama starting off with a photo agency issues a fiery rejection to prince harry and meghan markel s request for footage of their alleged near-catastrophic car chase writing, okay, this is epic. in america property belongs to the owner of it, third parties cannot just demand it be given to them as perhaps kings could do. whoa! rachel: amazing response. i think this is very dramatic. the reason they issued that response though is because meghan and harry sent a statement to this photo agency out in california saying we hereby demand rachel: yes. that you immediately provide us with copy of the photos and is videos, and they re saying that s not how this works. rachel: prince harry called the first amendment bonkers. yes. rachel: i always wondered how he was going to acclimate, not so well. not happening. the thing that s interesting about this story is there s still so much speculation over what happened when they was such a highly photographed event. pap