in the administration over the plan. a senior official told fox news a short time ago that mike pompeo, and secretary of state, and vice president mike pence, were fully aligned on the president s decisions regarding afghanistan. fox news has been told in the past that they are being driven by pompeo and the former u.s. ambassador to afghanistan. and that pence, bolden, and other members of the team are skeptical of this idea of signing the peace deal with the taliban for the very reason, harris, that it could potentially take us back to every word pre9/11. with the taliban fully in control of afghanistan. we all know what happened after that. harris? harris: john roberts, you have set us up for those two big stories breaking the seller. more on the situation with afghanistan in the moment. i want to get inside the white house now where that briefing has begun, with the acting director, the acting secretary of the customs and border patrol right now. mark morgan. we do know the appre
congressman seth molten joining us. good to see you again. good to see you, victor, again. and i wanted to ask you about the armed services position of what is happening with iran? and there is more information that the president is more hawkish on iran, and what is your degree of confidence that this is not going to escalate especially over the british tanker seizure to military response? i have no confidence, because this is a terribly erratic president, and remember, this is the president who organized air strikes against iran and canceled them 10 minutes later, and he clearly has no strategy. the administration is not on the same place and you have bolden and pompeo wanting to go to war and press the case and the president can t make up his mind. what we need is a commander in chief with a very clear strategy that lays out a pathway for iran to improve the behavior in exchange for releasing sanctions, but it does not say a regime change which is
all of a sudden you re flooding everywhere, some serious situations over at canal road not far from here, but very interesting we have been talking about this iran deal. you mentioned ambassador bolden in the secretary of state, the president is want in the regime to be careful as it continues to enrage greater and greater amounts of uranium and while you might argue, are they even maybe this plea is falling on on listen to ears, maybe not. certainly it s getting around the globe, the white house is preach and call him on the they are warning the starkest of terms what might happen to the regime. that was the message echoed by the vice president this afternoon at an event celebrating u.s. israeli ties. iran should not confuse american restraint with a lack of american result. [applause] we hope for the past. the united states of america and our military are prepared to
president trump who continues to take his america first message straight to the voters announcing a 2020 rally in north carolina. the same day as mueller s testimony. joining me now is ken starr, along with former u.s. attorney bret holman, and david sean. great to have all of you with us here. judge, let me start with you. i remember the comey testimony vividly because i right about it extensively in my book. and it strikes me that if there is an email that essentially, you know, loretta lynch, the attorney general and saying, i m not going to let the case go too far against hillary clinton, my goodness, doesn t that need to be declassified? yes indeed, gregg, i think you when, and the american people are in agreement, we need more rather than less. and especially in light of the
ones, the russians act from democrat opportunists. the email reportedly provided assurances that attorney general lynch would protect secretary clinton by making sure that the fbi investigation did not go too far. how and when did you first learn of this document? also who sent it? and who received it? that is not a question and i can answer in this forum, it would be a classified response parade i have briefed leadership of the intelligence committee on that issue. but i cannot talk about it here. gregg: why not? rather than focus on the 2016 election scandal, democrats are continuing to fuel mueller mania all across capitol hill even as their partners in the media are already sounding the alarm that this upcoming testimony could actually backfire. and only the holden, and bolden