when they dropped the pacifier logo explicitly targeting the gun to the teething toddler market, that might have seemed like it was signaling that they were abandoning the whole idea of assault rifles for kids, but no, it turns out they just dropped the pacifier logos and the cartoon font but they re making clear that it is not just for people with little tiny arms or not just for people with very poor upper body strength. it s still definitely for preschool. and the reason you can tell that it s still their targeted market for this gun is because this is the image that pops up on the splash page at their website. clear enough? here s another view of the same target consumer, maybe she s, what, 5? think she s 5? and if america is now marketing smaller, lighter, fully functional semiautomatic assault rifles for 5-year-olds, i mean,
the cartoon font, but they re making clearbu it is not just f people with little tiny arms or not just for people with very poor upper body strength, it s definitely for preschool. and the reason you can tell it s still their targeted market for this gun is because this is the image that pops up on the flash page at their website. clear enough? here s another view of the same target consumer. maybe she s, what, 5? i think she s 5. and if america is now marketing smaller, lighter fully functioning semiautomatic assault rifles for 5-year-olds, i mean what s next? why would we stop there? if they really want to get the full markett share that might available m to them maybe they could do a little one babies can use in the cribs. maybe they can fire it with their feet or something.