surprised ten years after september 11 that 54% say give me my rights. you know what, 71% favor surveillance cameras in public places. at least they say that. that s a lot of people willing to have someone watch their every move, especially when you think about some of the major cities and new york city, you know, cameras with cameras literally at a 360-degree angle. 58% favor random searches involving full body scans or pat-down of airplane passengers. 47% support allowing the government to read e-mails sent between people outside the u.s. what does it say about us here again ten years later, michael? i think some things we ve just grown accustomed to. you mentioned the surveillance cameras like you would find in mid-town manhattan or like are prevalent in the united kingdom in london. i think we ve accepted that. those cameras are in areas where frankly you should not have an expectation of privacy, but when you say about how about a
air transportation. shoes off. jackets off. luggage lost, gone. liquids limited to tiny containers. laptops out of their bags. metal detectors like we used to have. puffer machines and body scans, detailed body scans. intrusions kept secret. despite federal laws to collect communication, in 2002, president bush plans to order expanding more ease dropping on u.s. citizens in the united states. it remains secret until t the nw york times exposes it. they ruled it unconstitutional by a judge. the government repeals and wins. bank accounts, credit cards,
of transportation. bag and suitcase contents scrutinized, shoes off, jackets off. luggage locks and lighters gone. liquids limited to tiny containers. laptops out of their bags. explosive detecting swabs. metal detectors like we used to have but also puffer machines and body scans. and really detailed body scans. intrusion. intrusion by means the public at least knows about, but also intrusion by means kept secret. despite federal laws limiting the security agency from collecting only foreign communications, president bush expands more or less eavesdropping on u.s. citizens within the united states. that directive remained secret until will new york times exposes it in 2005. a year later, the program is ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge. but the government appeals the decision, and wins. bank accounts, credit cards, email, phone calls, business records, library records, all
name of national security. in november 2001, president bush signs a law creating the transportation security administration. the new mega-agency, the department of homeland security, would provide over air travel safety now, not the department of transportation. bag and suitcase contents scrutinized, shoes off, jackets off. luggage locks and lighters gone. liquids limited to tiny containers. laptops out of their bags. explosive detecting swabs. metal detectors like we used to have but also puffer machines and body scans. and really detailed body scans. intrusion. intrusion by means the public at least knows about, but also intrusion by means kept secret. despite federal laws limiting the security agency from collecting only foreign communications, president bush expands more or less eavesdropping on u.s. citizens within the united states. that directive remained secret ç until will new york times exposes it in 2005. a year later, the program is ruled unconstitutional by a federal ju
of transportation. bag and suitcase contents scrutinized, shoes off, jackets off. luggage locks and lighters gone. liquids limited to tiny containers. laptops out of their bags. explosive detecting swabs. metal detectors like we used to have but also puffer machines and body scans. and really detailed body scans. intrusion. intrusion by means the public at least knows about, but also intrusion by means kept secret. despite federalç laws limiting the security agency from collecting only foreign communications, president bush expands more or less eavesdropping on u.s. citizens within the united states. that directive remained secret until will new york times exposes it in 2005. a year later, the program is ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge. but the government appeals the decision, and wins. bank accounts, credit cards, email, phone calls, business