And problems. I thought we captured the differences between us and Michael Dukakis. Though congress has natured federal spending at an alarming rate, Michael Dukakis has increased state spending in massachusetts twice as fast. The natural throwaway line is its negative campaigning, but it aes comparative campaigning. How do you contrast two philosophies and two ways of running for government if you cant compare . Michael dukakis promises not to raise taxes. But as governor, he imposed the largest tax increase in massachusetts history. He promised jobs. Since 1984, massachusetts lost 90,000 bluecollar jobs. And now he wants to do for america what hes done for massachusetts. America cant afford that risk. People will sit there until theyre blue in the face saying they hate negative ads, but theyre the only ones they remember. Dukakis loves the moral highgrand so much, he wont left estrich play dirty. We had one in the camp with the helicopter flying over bushs house in kennebunkport. The
Montana
United-states
Louisiana
Qatar
Vermont
Turkey
Beijing
China
California
Syria
Russia
Washington