Morgan staffs the entire operation and they have 3 allegedly independent owners well when we did digging these people dont own anything they actually didnt contribute any money they are just Board Members and we recently got j. P. Morgan to admit that 2 of the 3 owners are there because j. P. Morgan submitted their names as references dozens of people going to realize that Pension Funds are like the toxic waste dump for risk in any bad trade because the people the math there purposefully hire stupid people to manage these Pension Funds public Pension Funds and they just go there and they dump garbage in there i know ive worked on wall street and ive done many bad trait that should have been on somebodys rich guys account and dump it into a pension fund because they have no way to stop it its just its the you know thats the way to go and yet we already found one example of self dealing where in 2018 j. P. Morgan owned 100. When a 1000000 class a shares of this Wind Power Company called
Whats happening President Trump is parading the fed once again saying we need negative Interest Rates because we are of course in a monetary war and a trade war with around the world hes pointing to europe having negative rates and that we cant compete with europe if we dont have negative rates against china of course hes always saying china manipulates their currency and they we have an free fair trade with them and here is a headline about that from china looking at the United States china u. S. Rivalry on brink of becoming a quote financial war former minister says the growing rivalry between china and the United States is at risk of becoming a financial war a former chinese finance minister said on saturday way chairman of the Foreign Affairs committee of the chinas people political consult of conference e p p c c National Committee he said quote the next step in the frictions between china and United States is a financial war it is characterized by the use of long arm jurisdiction
Excuses the block specific enterprises such as the bans on z t e and huawei of finance or the women talked about for a while finally the mainstream is kind of getting it to the side trying to figure out what exactly does it may and this pressure to go to negative Interest Rates is a stall just on steroids other words trump is saying we want to go back to the 20th century and the way to get there when america was pretty dominant and we want to get there by going backwards in time and the only way can do that is if you were to revalue the worth of time and take it from having a positive linear Going Forward positive Interest Rate having a negative Interest Rate remember europe is stuck in the past its a museum nothing ever happens there and thats what a donald trump would like to do would like to go back to the 1960 s. And 1970 s. When america was great and disco was was was on the turntable of course america. Runs their empire as an empire of debt and all of that debt is backed by deriv
all right, welcome everyone to this morning s panel appalachia and energy politics. i m trish kajla assistant professor at the walsh school of foreign service georgetown university copa where i co-lead the energy humanities research initiative. panel, because we were unsatisfied with the state of the current discussion on appalachian energy politics in the making of modern american history. contemporary debates about energy politics and the transition away from fossil fuels depart from a basic assumption that congress makes the law and that energy producing communities must learn how to live with it. in this panel, we propose an alternative way of examining modern energy policy and politics in the united states. our research looks at appalachia not only as a key target of modern energy policy, but rather as a region whose politics broadly conceived have shaped the possibilities and priorities for energy politics on the national stage since the new deal. together these papers
this morning s panel appalachia and energy politics. i m trish kajla assistant professor at the walsh school of foreign service georgetown university copa where i co-lead the energy humanities research initiative. panel, because we were unsatisfied with the state of the current discussion on appalachian energy politics in the making of modern american history. contemporary debates about energy politics and the transition away from fossil fuels depart from a basic assumption that congress makes the law and that energy producing communities must learn how to live with it. in this panel, we propose an alternative way of examining modern energy policy and politics in the united states. our research looks at appalachia not only as a key target of modern energy policy, but rather as a region whose politics broadly conceived have shaped the possibilities and priorities for energy politics on the national stage since the new deal. together these papers offer an appalachia out perspec