Ght. That means go oh, yeah. Start saying yes to your companys best ideas. Were gonna hit our launch date scream thank you goodbye we help all types of businesses with money, tools and knowhow to get business done. American express open. Its a dark and stormy night in washington. Welcome to kasie d. C. Im kasie hunt. We are live every sunday from 7 00 to 9 00 p. M. Eastern. Tonight a certain interview with a certain porn star. Well talk about Stormy Daniels allegations plus the new kids on the block. Well talk about the new trump Foreign Policy and legal teams. And a trump oracle warns of even more changes to come. And later, my interview with democratic senator Claire Mccaskill who has some frank
words for Hillary Clinton. And tells the National Party she doesnt care what they think. And from generation to generation, movement to movement, well talk about an Inflection Point of protest in washington with civil rights icon john lewis. But first we are awaiting the video of Stormy Danie
David Gura hosts coverage of national and international news, including breaking stories. Conflicting information from weekend to weekend about what the president may or may not do, david. Geoff, thank you very much. Appreciate it as always. Geoff bennett joining us from the white house. I want to turn to my panel. Joyce, let me start with you. Bearing in mind, youre not an expert on election law, but i want to stick with one point that geoff just raised there about the dangers, the legal dangers of taking a meeting with representatives of a foreign country to offer dirt here on an opposing candidate in a u. S. Election. Help us understand the legal consequences of that. Theres a very specific statute that prohibits this kind of conduct. It makes it illegal to accept or to solicit a donation or a contribution related to a u. S. Election from either a foreign citizen or a foreign government. So on its face, that prohibition would seem to apply pretty clearly. If, for instance, while run
the southern district of new york and he wouldn t say that he didn t try to do that. why would that be? yes, so first there s a predicate we ought to discuss, and that is everybody right now in the southern district of new york is a career civil servant. i believe the u.s. toernl is at not confirmed by the southern district. you cannot define any of them. reassigning career asas would be extraordinary. all of that said, we discussed on your show, nicolle, the fact what s going on in the southern district of new york, the financial investigation of the campaign, of the inaugural committee, of the trump foundation, of the trump organization, of the trumps themselves is as important as the work bob mueller is doing. so you would also hope, although there s no reason to have any hope any longer in matt whitaker, but you would also hope he would be able to say that, he would protect the men and women in the southern
in correlate. that means that the other people who you re working with, other witnesses, can have confidence in you and that the judges have confidence in you. you didn t have that today. i m not saying there was a vote of no confidence. i just said the thing did not go today the way bob mueller wanted it to go. and that s a setback. back to the idea of collusion and the president referencing you in his public statements on twitter. to be dlaer, he s using you to claim exoneration. you don t think he s been exonerated. right. we have to get all the evidence. i ve been consistent on this. let s gather all the evidence, which i think bob mueller is doing. let s assess it, evaluate it. i think what has been proven, at least in charged indictments, and there s a presence of innocence, sen orms russian interference. and the more the data come, in the more we see that the russians at very high levels were interfering with the american democratic process. and that s unconscionable. but wh
president to put a yes man in there who is going to shut down the mueller investigation on his behalf. is there anything congress could do at this point, congressman, to protect mueller and his investigation? well, first of all, adequate funding for the work that bob mueller is doing. there should also be legislation. there was a bipartisan bill moving to the senate, i believe, that the white house basically squelched. but there should be legislation at this point, the parties coming together, the senate that s controlled by republicans, the democratic house, to protect bob mueller and make sure that this investigation can continue through. do you think you ll get some republican support for that effort? you know, the evidence from the past doesn t suggest that that s a great prospect. but i think it s important to realize that what happened yesterday is that the american people voted for divided government. they voted for a republican-controlled senate and a democratic-control