hypotheticals here, but the vast majority of people can be brought before a grand jury. in the case of history with bill clinton, they ultimately voluntarily agreed to provide the president s testimony. i m not saying we re anywhere near that, but you asked the question about the power, bob mueller felt that included getting the testimony of the president, and the president did appear. so this is very different than for example just an fbi interview. we heard about mike flynn, the former national security adviser appearing before the fbi. that would be traditional powers and the grand jury allows you to bring people in the setting under oath and allows you a lot of tools in gathering evidence. we knew there was a grand jury involved in the investigations into michael flynn and paul manafort. that s right. who does that play into this? would this be a different one or perhaps the same one? you re pointing to the important i distinction here. there s an important inquiry and one