Have a professional history. He didnt need to mention everyone agrees. Mueller in the letter the way he the manner in which theyre in a did. Box is they have to decide if mueller finished tonight. Did you see any evidence, clues, the crime of Obstruction Of Justice and Witness Tampering anything like that because youve been on the ground . And others, if thats still illegal. If they still think its a crime. I think the letter codified the Personality Traits we have already seen from this new Attorney General as weve been waiting for this report to be has donald trump given them a delivered here to him. He stayed calm. Taken way in congress. We saw him around the Justice Department. He eats lunch with the staff and cafeteria, the Justice Department which is not normally so we have mtp beat. Anything you recommend if you have a nice lunch. He eats with staff every day around noon. He seems to stick to a schedule. Actually thought you were he sees reporters in the leaving. Hallway. He may
Everything is on the up and up, if this was a peft call, you would want even to go and tell your story and the fact they havent done so to me is incredibly telling. Mark, garrett, who i hope is getting a chance to read through these 17 pages of the summary, the preface to the report. Ive asked you this before. Listen, if theres no wrong doing and perry or mulvaney wanted to fund the president , republicans, you got your shot to call some people. Over to katy tur. Thank you very much. Good afternoon. Were following Breaking News at this hour. The Intelligence Committee has just released its report on the impeachment inquiry. House democrats say in no Uncertain Terms the president personally solicit Election Interference from a foreign governmecountry, quote, the evi overwhelming and so, too, is the evidence of his obstruction of congress. Joining me now is garrett and
jake. Also with us, former intel staffer, mika. Everybody, welcome. Garrett, you were just talking with stephanie and al
You. For going on three years innocent people have been accused of very serious crimes, including treason. Accusations made even here today. They have had their lives disrupted and in some cases destroyed by false accusations for which there is absolutely no basis other than some people desperately wish that it was so. But your report is clear. No evidence of conspiracy, no evidence of coordination. I believe we owe it to these people, who have been falsely accused, including the president and his family, to make that very clear. Mr. Mueller, the credibility of your report is based on integrity of how it is handled. Theres something that i think bothers me and other americans. Im holding a binder of 25 examples of leaks that occurred from the Special Counsels office and those associated with you dating back to a few weeks after your inception and beginning of your work and continuing up to just a few months ago. All of these, all of them, have
one thing in common. They were designed to
are democrats seizing on this ukraine phone call, the withholding of aid, what s happening with the g president interaction with ukraine in a wayth that they didn t seize on thedn mueller report? thisle has gone so much faster. this has been a matter we are i believe on day 70 or 71 of the impeachment inquiry. that is light speed fast to get from we just found out about this, we re going to open an inquiry, to this report is being submitted to the judiciary committee and articles of impeachment could be drawn up before the end of the year. we are already in december. that s a big question. i don t have the whole answer. we can ask different democrats and different members of congress because some said mueller was enough and others didn t. may i gesture an answer? sure. i think part of the answer is when bob mueller didn t find an election-related crime, i think a lotec of democrats paused and said is this the one to go to the mat on, even though obstruction is serious and bill
for to help ukraine defend itself against russia. so let s take that to dahlia. how important is it beyond the particulars that the case against the president involved protecting democracy itself? because to your point, there were people in the country who feel that whatever happened with russia, bob mueller did an exhaustive investigation and he didn t charge anyone for election conspiracy. there are people who feel that the russia stuff was ultimately overplayed at a criminal level when bob mueller didn t find a russia-u.s. criminal conspiracy. and now they re hearing, no, he s doing it with ukraine. you could forgive people for being skeptical. and yet the truth is it appears the president is trying to subvert democracy. if that s not impeachable, what is? that s why i think nancy pelosi when she reluctantly came to the conclusion she was going to have to announce an inquiry, she was careful to center this