Test. Test. How much of cadeta do we really get . Do we break the hard and concrete shelters or not . Theres advanced concrete which we worry about during the cold war. We have that issue and then revisit with higher missile rates because they cant tell whether they got the base or not. Discussion among the marine corps these days about why cant we in our air force proliferate the number of air ways in saipan and other places. Cadena but sh. Our aircraft could be one of six bases. You dont know which ones because we knocked out your satellites. To make sure you get the aircraft, take six spaces, not one but can focus on the base we know we have the aircraft and ignore the other bases. Drives up their costs because now they have no realize not only do they hit all six bases but assume all of our Missile Defenses are concentrated on that one base. And again, this involves multiple kinds of technologies all brought together and not just boost phase intercept and thats important, not just,
That said we really want to take a chunk of the i]budget, go over it and see whether we could do ataq things more effectively whether we could do emphasize some priorities better. I dont think you could do the owhole budget. You certainly couldnt do it every other year. ut you could set up a mechanism the budget say every three years or five years to see if the money could be spent better and the priorities were what congress reallyco wanted them to be. Bob . Can i just ask you a quick question . So is what alice describes on the domestic side, is the military really any different . Isnt there a certain amount of the air force, the navy, the marines, everybody has to get their share of the cuts . Broadly, the budget shares havent changed a lot. Thats a fair statement. Within those shares theyve changed a lot. Let me try to respond. First off i think its way too harsh that suggest that ovq all only 1 of Government Spending has any effect. I will offer just a couple examples. One obvious
You just wrote a book that says a lot of what the government does may not do any good and we spend i omitted the word may. Isnt there some point of having a Budget Constraint here which says to the congress, ok look, live within these things and lets spend more on the stuff that works and doesnt. Thats kind of the idea. Right. A, sent that a good idea . And b, why doesnt that ever happen . Why doesnt it ever happen . Why dont they set priorities and spend more on what they should and less on what they shouldnt . I think its just too hard. The government is gargantuan. Theres a book of Government Programs, if you dropped it on your toe, would you have to immediately go to the hospital. Thousands of pages. The government is just huge. How can you we cant even control the department of defense. We were in a meeting a couple months ago that had an important senior official and department of defense said they dont even know what the budget is. Is that correct . No, thats not right. Im talki
Administration, the president and the congress. So we do a number of things and i think its unfortunate that we suggest otherwise. In terms of accountabilrty, we absolutely know where were spending the money, down to a great deal of detail. You may not like the results that you see. Thats a fair point. And there are priorities set. I mean, i will give you a current example. We have backed much on Ground Forces over the last few years than we have any others. That was a painful decision, i can assure you, within the department of defense, but it was one consciously made based on a strategy that we felt in the aftermath of iraq and afghanistan we could afford smaller Ground Forces and still cutting but not as much the naval and air force. So i think alice is right, we can do better, but it is not as if we are just taking this money and sort of randomly spending it wherever we want and its not the case that theres no effect. Its easy if you mischaracterize someone. Thats not what im sayin
in the world, you have in your sports teams, franchises, salary caps, socialism for rich guy owners. there s none of that in the premier league. at tend of the day, we re just cheering for money, for excel spread sheets. this week the united states men pick up their qualification for world cup. it will be in qatar. roger bennett, thank you very much. and it s great to have you on. ed loose, your latest piece for the financial times is entitled we should pay more heed to alarmists. it sounds like very optimistic way to start the week. fill us in. i was responding to the bob kagen piece and my colleague martin wolf wrote a piece called the the strange death of more than democracy . just to push back, haven t we