Attention to where the court is sitting god save the United States and this honorable court. We will hear arguments this morning case number 19123 fulton versus city of philadelphia. Mr. Chief justice and mia please the court, and failing to understand where the controls and where it doesnt smith it doesnt control when the government uses a system ofndividualized exemptions or when it makes other exceptns to undermine the rule or when it changes the rules to prohibit a religious practice philadelphia made all three of those errors here. U can identify and apicable law even after six tempts and our kwledge is the decisions are subjective d individualized. The courts bel said smith would be a dead letter if petitioners prevailed and respondents asked the cou for a newly minted constitutional standard that approach has no basis in the traditions of the free exercise clause. The city has no compelling reason that is exercised by harris children in philadelphia for two centuries nor does it
Fulton versus city of philadelphia. The honorable chief justice and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Oye, oye, oye. All persons having business honorable, the Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to get their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States and this honorable court. Roberts we will hear argument this morning in case number 19120 three, fulton versus city of philadelphia. Ms. Windham . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. The courts below made a civil error. They fail to understand where smith controls and where does not. Smith does not control where a government uses individual exemptions or makes other exceptions that undermine rules or when it changes rules to prohibit a religious practice. Philadelphia made all three errors here. The city cannot identify a neutral, generally applicable law after six attempt. Attempts. It now acknowledges its decisions are subjective and individualized. Yet the cou
Couples. The Supreme Court has until june of next year, to issue a ruling in the case. Fulton versus city of philadelphia. The honorable, chief justice and associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. Oye, oye. All persons having business before the honorable, Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to get their attention for the court is now sitting. God save the United States and its honorable court. We will hear argument this morning in case number 19120 three, fulton versus city of philadelphia. Ms. Windham . Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, the courts below made a civil error. They failed to understand where a simple error. Date fail to understand where smith controls and where does not. Aith does not control where government uses individual exemptions or makes other exceptions that undermine rules or when it changes rules to prohibit a religious practice. Philadelphia made all three errors here. The city cannot identify a neutral, generall
That is he saying that this situation which is said to be the main cause for declaring a state of emergency was staged. In sudan about disruption of the queens mothercare truth be. So ready because hes so on that authority particularly the police didnt fall for the arrival of the motorcade which usually is a stand out that is high police in protests that have this guy that could to see to what is shot at that if there is more to care through the protest site that will stop the activity and. By this time it seemed that because they were unaware and suddenly the markets show up and in the all featured the creation of state of emergency by general prayuth by the Prime Minister the recent me and recent quality enforcement of state of emergency. He was the incident i think about the more they can cite at vide a crime is to ask the trick to a National Security think that while it is essential to enforce these and rocky and major areas and now hes starting to audit a racist mass a race off of
Over the banning of a Progressive Opposition party that was popular with young people and students and which was abandoned rather contentious and controversial circumstances by by the Constitutional Court but they have now and theyve moved into a wider ranging political demands there is anger that the government thats in place now is essentially led by the leader from. 2014 and from other on without the generals who took not in the in the last. Isolate demanding a new constitution that demanding that government step down but most contentiously and most explicitly theyve added many of them about it demands for reform to the royal familys role in thailand to add to their agenda they want to look at its budget how it perceives funds from the government and they also want to radio because of the political influence of the king now the royal family is a long venerated institution here loved by so many by many ties and previously its been considered absolutely to boot to and to raise questio