that was a that s a very rare instance, isn t it? absolutely and i agree with bob 100%. he hit the nail on the head. having a female involved, she was tactically sound and been trained, she s wearing tactical gear and what not so that certainly leads one down that road that the agent in charge was going down. so as they gather intelligence, anderson, i don t know if these two doa suspects had cell phones on them. i m sure they had been dumped. they are doing their homework. they probably know more than we do now. they are gathering all kinds of intel and we ll find out. it is interesting they would go back after the shooting to a residence whether it was something they actually lived or sole place they had just rented or somebody else there and would leave again, again unknown why they would have left, did they know they were under surveillance, did they want to
goes to the places where we ve had the most innovation of discrimination, that s what justice sotomayor said, the fact that you need to clear it in advance, because when you don t the people down there keep finding all these different ways to use race, to discriminate, to keep people from moving from moving polling places to voter i.d., that s why it s pre-clearance, you re discriminating based on race, something we ve always said is terrible and the fact that the court wants to get in there and overrule that i think potentially is very concerned. selma or not, anniversary or not. alice, i want to bring this in. interested to hear your take on the arguments made before the high court. i agree with bob 100%. i do believe scalia was way out of his line in his references to the perpetuation of racial issues in this, but i do agree with justice kennedy and times change and we ve come a long way but it is important to look at whether or not we need to hold these states that have been si
francisco and bob, thank you so much. thank you. eric: this is not going anywhere. we ll have a more discussion tomorrow night on record with greta van susteren whose guest is new mexico governor martinez. she has been outspoken about immigration reform. we have her thoughts tomorrow night 10:00 p.m. jamie: also, one college is taking a new approach to fighting obesity. taking money from sports programs and shifting it literally to the student body. can it work? we ll take a look.
based. we have less people competing for skills jobs. those coming in have the more value skill to value-added economy we have. and be prosperous. we don t need amnesty but we need redo for foundation of the immigration system. our side is going to have to give in on the automatic citizenship. i agree with you on that. this deal we are giving out the green cards, it doesn t matter. first figure out what to do with the kids, 15 to 25, 30. that have commit nod crime of their own. move to common ground and move to the 12 million potential tax contributors to save us economically in the country. there is the agenda. 12 million. the agenda for francisco is not the dream act but a massive amnesty. he said it. eric: well, bob i didn t say amnesty. i said we have to give that up. eric: all right. that is the debate. it will continue unless we get reform obviously.
there is widespread unemployment. do we want skilled workers? yes. but we need provable standards. this ignores the fact that you spend $150,000 and put your kid through college. now the kids are living in the basement, unemployed and 55,000 additional green cards to foreign students from india, china, pakistan and other areas. coming in and taking the jobs that belong to the u.s. u.s. residents. we also need high-tech skilled workers in this is political bait both sides. this has no chance to pass in lame duck congress. i agree with bob 100%. conditioning refuses to have the dialogue. this is a dialogue about what