response to stop the process the order stops. good orders and discipline is obey the president of the united states. how did the president explain to you the rationale behind restoring chief gallagher s rank? no. he doesn t have to. i do not interpret what the president does. i do what he says. rachel: then he doubled down on twitter. pete: yes. he tweeted. this he said i would like to further state in no way, shape or form did i threaten to resign. i serve at the pleasure of the president. i spoke to a senior administration official last night, confirmed that indeed, he said i do not want to resign. you look at this from the beginning, the president s tweet was clear, don t take away this guy s trident. the navy said and admiral green who is the head of the navy seals who said we are still going forward with this board process to strip him and other seals of their trident and it looks like because it is retribution for the fact that the president weighed in. listen, the president,
on the board process but the afghan people accepted it. that was a particular situation where the taliban were defeated the international community being tired of the international community came with what iran was on board an opponent of the us russia was on board had a lot of differences with us china was on board the saudis were on board and the afghan people accepted that arrangement we owned it and then that arrangement was indorsed by the emergency loya jirga subsequently in six months and within two years we had our constitution and the elections that came as a result so the afghans accepted the new order mr do you agree to those do you think there was enough support from the afghan population or even the rural plan allegedly afghans were not given enough options or you were caught between bad and horse like i would always say they like you had to go somewhere and you have fife their t. shirts shoes the list there. and unfortunately this is what happened to the afghan
the board process but the afghan people accepted it. that was a particular situation where the taliban were defeated the international community the entirety of the international community came on board iran was on board an opponent of the us russia was on board had a lot of difference some of us china was on board the saudis were on board and the afghan people accepted that arrangement we owned it and then that arrangement was indorsed by the emergency loya jirga subsequently in six months and within two years we had our constitution and elections that came as a result so the afghans accepted the new order mr do you agree to those do you think there was enough support from the afghan population or even the rural plan allegedly afghans were not given enough options or you were caught between bad and worse like i would always say they like you had to go somewhere and you have five dirty shifts and use the list there. and unfortunately this is what happened to the
have to guess and i have to say that they were the same accusations against you because you were installed by the united states enough got in and you don t care and i m aware and yes even if you don t win yes i wonder just how and why the united states and the board process but the afghan people accepted it. that was a particular situation where the taliban were defeated the international community the entirety of the international community came on board iran was on board an opponent of the us russia was on board had a lot of defense so yes china was on board the saudis were on board and the afghan people accepted that arrangement we owned it and then that arrangement was indorsed by the emergency loya jirga subsequently in six months and within two years we had our constitution and the elections that came as a result so the afghans accepted the new order mr do you agree to those do you think there was enough support from the afghan population or even the rural plan allegedly afghans
board despite all of its imperfections and warts are really distressed by the manner in which the current two member majority are ignoring board process, and ignoring the tradition. the republicans in the house of representatives, for whatever reason, seem to be intent on turning the board into a symbol of the obama administration s supposedly job killing agenda. the fact that we continue to discuss the national labor relations board is a testament to how political it is. republicans say the board has moved far left and democrats say republicans only seek to use the board as a scare tactic to push anti-union agenda. neil? neil: if they don t decide it this soon the further they push it back the more of a political issue it becomes, so, i guess both sides it is? their interest to see something done in the next few weeks, tops, next couple of months. guest: absolutely.