We will the jury will have this case tomorrow night. It seems like the defense was pretty restful before they rested. You know what i mean . Like not only did they not put the defendant on the stand, which of course would have been amazing blockbuster drama, but they didnt put any other witnesses on the stand, nor did they introduce evidence, substantial evidence. So its i mean, this is a legitimate and mainstream legal theory about how you defend your client, you try to create the impression in the jury that the prosecution doesnt even bear responding to their case was so weak. But those closing arguments tomorrow are going to be a big deal. Its going to be fascinating. Theres one line of evidence in this case that stands completely unrefuted by the defense. There was no crossexamination on this. And that was a treasury official getting on the stand and saying Paul Manafort did not report the existence of the following foreign bank accounts. Thats the description of a crime, for the d
They didnt put any other witnesses on the stand, nor did they introduce evidence, substantial evidence. So its i mean, this is a legitimate and mainstream legal theory about how you defend your client, you try to create the impression in the jury that the prosecution doesnt even bear responding to their case was so weak. But those closing arguments tomorrow are going to be a big deal. Its going to be fascinating. Theres one line of evidence in this case that stands completely unrefuted by the defense. There was no crossexamination on this. And that was a treasury official getting on the stand and saying Paul Manafort did not report the existence of the following foreign bank accounts. Thats the description of a crime, for the defense not to put something on the stand to refute that, to say it wasnt Paul Manaforts responsibility, something, anything, theres no defense on that. No. There was discussion on crossexamination im going to get this exactly. There was . Discussion of was Paul M
Back. Reporter i spent 20 days without being able to speak to him. Every time they move me from one facility to another, i would say, and my children, what about my children . And no laughing matter. How the attorney general of the United States responded to chants from a high school audience echoing Trump Campaign rallies. Ha ha ha. Lock her up. [ audience chants lock her up ] and good day, im Andrea Mitchell in washington. President trump is setting off political fireworks with an an unprecedented threat to strip security clearances from half a dozen former Top National Security and intelligence officials, veteran officials, some of whom worked for decades under president s of both political parties. The president is exploring the mechanisms to remove security clearance because theyve politicized and in some cases monetized their Public Service and security clearances. But the white house did not check two of the officials, former fbi director james comey and his Deputy Andrew mccabe
Man explain to me, will you . Im joking. All right. Guess what, that does it for us. Yasmine will pick up the coverage right now. Im sorry, the 52 extra seconds is on me. Come on. Thanks, joe. Hi there, and yasmine vossoughian. What is the big idea, the ideological battle for 2020 is already under way. Call it the billionaires versus the progressives candidates. Clashing over ideas that could reshape the electorate and the country. Ive been criticized for being a billionaire. Elizabeth warren wants to criticize me for being successful. Any minute now, high level trade negotiations will resume amid reports the president will meet with chinas lead negotiator tomorrow. After the u. S. File charges against huawei which the Chinese Government called unfair and immoral, are the talks already over before theyve begun . And shared intelligence. The heads of the cia, the fbi and director of National Intelligence testify in unison against almost everything the president has said about foreign th