in which the events transpired that night. so this morning, we ve heard very compelling evidence if the ballistics expert finally explaining, pulling together all of the previous physical evidence that has been presented at trial in order to attach a narrative to it. so we ve heard about the position that reev a steenkamp was standing in. we ve heard about how when the first shot went through the door and hit her in the hip, she would have fallen into a heated position on the magazine rack. we also heard the bullet hole in her arm would have been caused while her arm was in a defensive position and that the final bullet hole to her head caused her to slump down and have her head on the toilet, which is why there was so much blood at that part of the scene. so we re actually starting to hear a blow by blow account of what exactly occurred. pull all of this together for us, kelly, what is the prosecution actually tryinging to portray here? where is it going to end up?
the tragedy. and when i read the blow by blow account of what happened, you know, heroic efforts were made to save the ambassador and the other individuals. they were, there is no dispute about the heroes who tried to save them, but there is plenty of dispute about what should have been done to prevent them from coming under fire in the first place. because i look at this report from the senate intel committee, chaired by dianne feinstein who by the way said she doesn t like it getting political and doesn t agree that it was mrs. clinton s fault. but at the end of the day, the report says mrs. clinton was responsible for the safety of those serving in our administration, her failure to do so clearly made a difference, why is that not true? well, let me just say one thing, the report points out many, many examples of problems that took place. and also lays out a number of recommendations.
the tragedy. and when i read the blow by blow account of what happened, you know, heroic efforts were made to save the ambassador and the other individuals. they were, there is no dispute about the heroes who tried to save them, but there is plenty of dispute about what should have been done to prevent them from coming under fire in the first place. because i look at this report from the senate intel committee, chaired by dianne feinstein who by the way said she doesn t like it getting political and doesn t agree that it was mrs. clinton s fault. but at the end of the day, the report says mrs. clinton was responsible for the safety of those serving in our administration, her failure to do so clearly made a difference, why is that not true? well, let me just say one thing, the report points out many, many examples of problems that took place. and also lays out a number of recommendations.
expedite the process. glad to get that started. thank you, sir. coming up next, legendary newsman bob woodward wrote a blow by blow account of the tense 2011 debt ceiling talks. will it go any better this time? we ll see what he thinks. remember edward snowden, who fled the u.s. with spy secrets? wait until you hear what he s up to now besides coat shopping for the long russian winter. at farmers, we make you smarter about insurance.
petraeus will give a blow by blow account of what happened in the deadly attack in benghazi that led to the death of four americans including the u.s. ambassador. director petraeus went to tripoli and interviewed many of the people as i understand that there were involved. there will be hearings in the benghazi attack. most closed to the public one was open. most of the focus is on u.s. ambassador susan rice who back in department appeared on five sunday talk shows with a talking point. it appeared to be the work of protestors not terrorists as it now piers. the implication is that it was had he height of the leblgs season. the dishonest at this