okay. these new photos that were put out by tactical photographer i believe from the massachusetts state police which are incredibly intense about the moments of his capture. if that were on the cover, would that do the same thing? in some ways this seems almost more glorifying, him as this bloodies warrior. i think that the point of this image is it s really inescapable to think that the rolling stone editors wouldn t have thought about the effects of this cover and what it looked like. and i understand that they wanted to point out that, you know, all terrorists don t come packaged like caricatures who are angry and unattractive, they can be people who walk among us. i get that. when your first encounter with the magazine is the cover and seeing it packaged like a rock star, it gives the impression that this kid is something of a rock star. and there are, you know, that has an impact. there are he has fans.
on the cover of the new york times and in a news context you could understand it and place it in context. on rolling stone, on the cover, he looks like a stroke. he looks like a jonas brother. he looks like someone who would be dating taylor swift. right. he doesn t look like you re saying the combination of this magazine with this cover, there so no way to escape that. here s my other question. okay. these new photos that were put out by tactical photographer i believe from the massachusetts state police which are incredibly intense about the moments of his capture. if that were on the cover, would that do the same thing? in some ways this seems almost more glorifying, him as this bloodies warrior. i think that the point of this image is it s really inescapable to think that the rolling stone editors wouldn t have thought about the effects of this cover and what it looked like.
cover, there so no way to escape that. here s my other question. okay. these new photos that were put out by tactical photographer i believe from the massachusetts state police which are a incredibly intense about the moments of his capture. if that were on the cover, would that do the same thing? in some ways this seems almost more glorifying, him as this bloodies warrior. i think that the point of this image is it s really inescapable to think that the rolling stone editors wouldn t have thought about the effects of this cover and what it looked like. and i understand that they wanted to point out that, you know, all terrorists don t come packaged like caricatures who are angry and unattractive, they can be people who walk among us. i get that. when your first encounter with the magazine is the cover and seeing it packaged like a rock star, it gives the impression that this kid is something of a rock star. and there are, you know, that has an impact.